Package: extra-cmake-modules
Version: 5.23.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Source: extra-cmake-modules
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps fileordering
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds”
Source: frog
Version: 0.12.20-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that frog
could not be built
Source: bind9
Version: 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that bind9
could not
Source: aghermann
Version: 1.0.9-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that
aghermann could not be
Source: cmtk
Version: 3.2.2-1.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ordering
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that cmtk
could not be built
Source: glances
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that glances
could not be built
Source: icu4j
Version: 57.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that icu4j
could not be built
Package: diffoscope
Version: 54
Tags: patch
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I seem find the "No differences found inside, yet data differs" message
misleading every time I read it.
There *are* differences found inside, as the second clause of the sentence
confirms - what it's really trying to