On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 07:29:13AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > It could be argued that "We are mainly interested in the
> > reproducibility issue, the FTBFS bugs are just a side effect".
>
> Indeed.
> I'm fully open to such tests, but imho they would need to be on a
> different project.
> Bes
Hi,
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > And to that I would say "Fine, but what's the point in making a
> > package reproducible when it does not even build from source to begin
> > with?"
>
> That's an overstatement: packages most usually build just fine ^^
> If the they fail to build is a altoghether dif
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:59:17PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> If the reproducible builds autobuilders continue to build with
> (the equivalent of) "dpkg-buildpackage", the following FTBFS will be
> missed:
They use `dpkg-buildpackage -b`
> The ideal thing would be to have separate queues for "
Greetings.
If the reproducible builds autobuilders continue to build with
(the equivalent of) "dpkg-buildpackage", the following FTBFS will be
missed:
Packages which FTBFS in every autobuilder, including "Arch: all" if it
were uploaded in source-only form, like this one:
https://bugs.debian.org/
