Satyam Zode:
> Yes! I'm looking at those issues but it seems those issues are more in
> number. Frankly speaking, I'm not completely aware about many of those.
> Hence, I'm requesting you all to give some suggestions (and may be list of
> issues) so that I can start working on it further.
> Or
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:44:11PM +0200, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Concretely I have some suggestions:
>
> 1. instead of calling this "ignore" we call it "hide". and instead of
> "irrelevant" we say "common"/"minor"/"known"
strong ACK.
I really really like "--hide-timestamps" much better than
Jérémy Bobbio:
> Ximin Luo:
>> This is quite an open-ended problem and there is no single "correct"
>> answer. I don't even know myself what would be best, at this stage.
>
> I think what we need to come up with now is a list of use cases. Then we
> can decide which one we want to support and how
Ximin Luo:
> This is quite an open-ended problem and there is no single "correct"
> answer. I don't even know myself what would be best, at this stage.
I think what we need to come up with now is a list of use cases. Then we
can decide which one we want to support and how easy it should be.
Is
Hi Satyam,
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:49:12PM +0530, Satyam Zode wrote:
> I have started thinking about the solution of this problem and for that, I
> want to know as a diffoscope user, what kind of stuff would you like to
> ignore ? Such as any irrelevant differences which are just making noise
Hi, all !
I am Satyam Zode, I am GSoC student intern (http://satyamz.github.io
/blog/2016/05/08/google-summer-of-code-2016-with-debian
-reproducible-builds-introduction/).
I am trying to understand the problem "Allow users to ignore arbitrary
differences" ( --ignore-profiles flag) in which
