On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:37:25PM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 05:36:58PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Now the package is in "uncategorized state", which means it fails to
> > build reproducibly but we don't know the exact reason, so it will need
> > to be
Hi,
The left column of reproducible status for gcin [0] displays gcin
version as 2.8.3+dfsg1-6. However, if we clikc the link for detail
result, the version annotated is actual 2.8.2+dfsg1-1.
[0] https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/testing/amd64/gcin.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 05:36:58PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:13:09AM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
> > The left column of reproducible status for gcin [0] displays gcin
> > version as 2.8.3+dfsg1-6. However, if we clikc the link for detail
> > result, the version
