[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828223: mvtnorm: FTBFS: dh_clean: Please specify the compatibility level in debian/compat

Source: mvtnorm Version: 1.0-5-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, mvtnorm fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828224: nose: FTBFS: FAIL: runTest (test_coverage_plugin.TestCoveragePlugin) [..] AssertionError: False is not true

Source: nose Version: 1.3.7-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, nose fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

[Reproducible-builds] RE

Thirty Million Dollars Donated to you by Eng. Azim Premji. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828621: opencolorio: FTBFS: ! Undefined control sequence.

Source: opencolorio Version: 1.0.9~dfsg0-5 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, opencolorio fails to build from source in

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828628: media-player-info: please make the build reproducible

Source: media-player-info Version: 22-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828627: uim: please make the build reproducible (locale)

Source: uim Version: 1:1.8.6+gh20160621.0.87bf935-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the "€œreproducible builds"€ effort [1], we

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828634: python-oauth2client: FTBFS: error: [Errno 110] Connection timed out

Source: python-oauth2client Version: 2.0.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, python-oauth2client fails to build from source in

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828222: pygoocanvas: please make the build reproducible

Source: pygoocanvas Version: 0.14.1-1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that pygoocanvas could

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828212: pyinfra: FTBFS: Theme error: sphinx_rtd_theme is no longer a hard dependency since version 1.4.0. Please install it manually.(pip install sphinx_rtd_theme)

Source: pyinfra Version: 0.1~dev24-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, pyinfra fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828216: pyinfra:

Source: pyinfra Version: 0.1~dev26-1 Severity: wishlist User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org The tests (now activated) for Pyinfra fail during test build for reproducible builds, there are some assertion

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828635: libnet-tclink-perl: please make the build reproducible

Source: libnet-tclink-perl Version: 2.4.9.1+dfsg-1.5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: uname X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

Control: tag -1 - patch Control: severity -1 normal Hi Reiner, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed > that libembperl-perl could not be built reproducibly. Thanks for the examination and the bug report. > In one build the manpage

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828681: keyutils: please make the build reproducible

Source: keyutils Version: 1.5.9-9 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that keyutils could not be

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828683: mc: please make the build reproducible

Source: mc Version: 3:4.8.17-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that mc could not be built

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:16:52 +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > Sorry, but that's wrong: > > > > → dpkg -L libembperl-perl | egrep man/de/man./ > > /usr/share/man/de/man3/Embperl::Features.3pm.gz > > → man /usr/share/man/de/man3/Embperl::Features.3pm.gz > > > > That's clearly my mother tongue.

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 05:07:54PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > I currently fail to see why this can catch Embperl::Syntax::POD in one > build, but not in another. IMHO this should happen with every build. > Will investigate. It's actually related to the shell... $ touch aD bD cD dD eD AD BD $

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

Source: libembperl-perl Version: 2.5.0-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: randomness X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that libembperl-perl

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828639: libmarpa-r2-perl: please make the build reproducible

Source: libmarpa-r2-perl Version: 2.086000~dfsg-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

Hi! gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:16:52 +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > > Sorry, but that's wrong: > > > > > > → dpkg -L libembperl-perl | egrep man/de/man./ > > > /usr/share/man/de/man3/Embperl::Features.3pm.gz > > > → man /usr/share/man/de/man3/Embperl::Features.3pm.gz > >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 05:07:54PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > In one build the manpage Embperl::Syntax::POD.3pm is incorrectly sorted > > to the German manpages (Embperl::FeaturesD too), because their names end > > with D. > > Why only in one build? Due to different locale settings? Anyway,

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828680: debiandoc-sgml-doc-pt-br: please make the build reproducible

Source: debiandoc-sgml-doc-pt-br Version: 1.1.12+nm Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Pkg-mc-devel] Bug#828683: mc: please make the build reproducible

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 09:00:50PM +0200, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > >The attached patch uses SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH as a deterministic timestamp > >instead. > > I wouldn't mind upstreaming this patch as long as SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is at > least halfway standardized. Could you please tell me whether this

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Pkg-mc-devel] Bug#828683: mc: please make the build reproducible

Hi Reiner, On Sun, 26 Jun 2016, Reiner Herrmann wrote: While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that mc could not be built reproducibly. It embeds the current date into the mcedit manpage during build. That's my fault: the dates were originally entered by hand,

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Pkg-mc-devel] Bug#828683: mc: please make the build reproducible

Hi Reiner, On Sun, 26 Jun 2016, Reiner Herrmann wrote: Yes, it is standardized [1] and already supported by a lot of build tools [2], e.g. even by gcc. Other distributions and FreeBSD are currently also in the process of adopting it. Thank you for the clarifications! Maybe you could

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Pkg-mc-devel] Bug#828683: mc: please make the build reproducible

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016, Reiner Herrmann wrote: While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that mc could not be built reproducibly. It embeds the current date into the mcedit manpage during build. Ok, I think that I can now see what went wrong here: Debian used to