Re: [Reproducible-builds] dh_shlibdeps dependency ordering not stable if alternate dependency templates are used

> shouldn't we upload dpkg with that fix to our repo then? If the impact was more widespread, then definitely.. but am tempted to wait until some response from dpkg maintainers, especially as I'm not 100% confident in the patch. -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@

Re: [Reproducible-builds] dh_shlibdeps dependency ordering not stable if alternate dependency templates are used

Hi, On Samstag, 18. Juli 2015, Chris Lamb wrote: > Fixed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792491 shouldn't we upload dpkg with that fix to our repo then? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. _

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792821: pkg-config: [PATCH] please make the build reproducible

Package: pkg-config Version: 0.28-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that pkg-config could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch set the environment

Re: [Reproducible-builds] reproducible builds of FreeBSD in a chroot on Linux

Ed Maste wrote this message on Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 16:48 -0400: > These are used only as user-facing strings for the kern.version sysctl > and reported by uname. An example kern.version string: > FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #28 r280427+86df2de(stable-10): Thu Mar 26 16:07:47 EDT > 2015 > emaste@feynm

Re: [Reproducible-builds] dh_shlibdeps dependency ordering not stable if alternate dependency templates are used

> > > btw: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/pyopencl.html > > > > After fixing the other issues, I now have a reproducability rate of 50% ... > > IIRC you are repeating a failed test once to ignore some spurious > > failures? So you would end up at an error rate of 25% - or le

Re: [Reproducible-builds] dh_shlibdeps dependency ordering not stable if alternate dependency templates are used

Hi Andreas, On Freitag, 10. Juli 2015, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2015-07-09 20:23, Holger Levsen wrote: > >> The issue is nondeterministic - a first rebuild after partly fixing > >> another reproducibility issue has not shown this again. > > > > btw: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unst

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792783: linuxlogo: please make the build reproducible

Source: linuxlogo Version: 5.11-7 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that linuxlogo could not be buil

Re: [Reproducible-builds] reproducible builds of FreeBSD in a chroot on Linux

Hi, so I made some progress on this: a.) there is a build host running freebsd 10.1 (called freebsd-jenkins.debian.net) now, on which the jenkins user from jenkins.debian.net can login via ssh as jenkins user b.) besides the base system it has "screen git vim sudo denyhosts" installed and c.) t

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#791574: marked as done (strip-nondeterminism: failure in zip.pm, breaking package builds)

Your message dated Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:34:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#791574: fixed in strip-nondeterminism 0.009-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #791574, regarding strip-nondeterminism: failure in zip.pm, breaking package builds to be marked as done. This means that you clai

[Reproducible-builds] strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:45:14 -0700 Source: strip-nondeterminism Binary: libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl strip-nondeterminism dh-strip-nondeterminism Architecture: source all Version: 0.009-1 Distribution: unstable Urgenc

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1_amd64.changes

strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1.dsc strip-nondeterminism_0.009.orig.tar.xz strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1.debian.tar.xz dh-strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1_all.deb libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl_0

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1_amd64.changes

strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1.dsc strip-nondeterminism_0.009.orig.tar.xz strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1.debian.tar.xz dh-strip-nondeterminism_0.009-1_all.deb libfile-stripnondeter

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#792667: jack-audio-connection-kit: please make the build reproducible

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:02:45AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > - @sed -e "s/!VERSION!/@JACK_RELEASE@/g" -e "s/!DATE!/`date '+%B %Y'`/g" > < $*.0 > $@ > + @sed -e "s/!VERSION!/@JACK_RELEASE@/g" -e "s/!DATE!/`LANG=C date --utc > --date="`dpkg-parsechangelog -l../debian/changelog -SDate`" '+%

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792772: titanion: please make the build reproducible

Source: titanion Version: 0.3.dfsg1-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that titanion could not be b

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792771: mu-cade: please make the build reproducible

Source: mu-cade Version: 0.11.dfsg1-8 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that mu-cade could not be bu