[Reproducible-builds] Bug#811354: brian: FTBFS: TypeError: histogram() got an unexpected keyword argument 'new'
Source: brian Version: 1.4.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, brian fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..] brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically brian.HomogeneousPoissonThreshold: WARNING HomogeneousPoissonThreshold cannot generate enough spikes. brian.HomogeneousPoissonThreshold: WARNING HomogeneousPoissonThreshold cannot generate enough spikes. brian.HomogeneousPoissonThreshold: WARNING HomogeneousPoissonThreshold cannot generate enough spikes. brian.HomogeneousPoissonThreshold: WARNING HomogeneousPoissonThreshold cannot generate enough spikes. brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically In file included from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/ndarraytypes.h:1781:0, from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/ndarrayobject.h:18, from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/arrayobject.h:4, from /home/lamby/temp/cdt.20160118093221.T7TISOkJO9/brian-1.4.1/build/.cache/scipy/python27_compiled/sc_90e487a2aefd5b25f36d2d8f047c1c640.cpp:23: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/npy_1_7_deprecated_api.h:15:2: warning: #warning "Using deprecated NumPy API, disable it by " "#defining NPY_NO_DEPRECATED_API NPY_1_7_API_VERSION" [-Wcpp] #warning "Using deprecated NumPy API, disable it by " \ ^ brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically brian.HomogeneousPoissonThreshold: WARNING HomogeneousPoissonThreshold cannot generate enough spikes. brian.HomogeneousPoissonThreshold: WARNING HomogeneousPoissonThreshold cannot generate enough spikes. brian.HomogeneousPoissonThreshold: WARNING HomogeneousPoissonThreshold cannot generate enough spikes. brian.HomogeneousPoissonThreshold: WARNING HomogeneousPoissonThreshold cannot generate enough spikes. brian.threshold : WARNING Using codegen PythonThreshold brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically brian.threshold : WARNING Using codegen PythonThreshold brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically brian.threshold : WARNING Using codegen PythonThreshold brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically brian.HomogeneousPoissonThreshold: WARNING HomogeneousPoissonThreshold cannot generate enough spikes. brian.HomogeneousPoissonThreshold: WARNING HomogeneousPoissonThreshold cannot generate enough spikes. brian.threshold : WARNING Using codegen CThreshold brian.equations : INFO Free variables: ['second'] brian.stateupdater: INFO Linear model: using exact updates brian.stateupdater: INFO Solving linear equations numerically In file included from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/ndarraytypes.h:1781:0, from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/ndarrayobject.h:18, from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/arrayobject.h:4, from /home/lamby/temp/cdt.20160118093221.T7TISOkJO9/brian-1.4.1/build/.cache/scipy/python27_compiled/sc_7cde335454d7a01c94e156351410d8fa0.cpp:22:
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#808207: diffoscope: Filter objdump --disassemble output before diffing it
Hi Mike! Mike Hommey: > When comparing large ELF binaries, some minor differences can end up hurting > the visibility of more important differences. > > Specifically, objdump --disassemble displays symbols+offsets for addresses > it derives from IP-relative addressing, like the following: > >9d2be2: 48 8d 05 42 65 24 02lea0x2246542(%rip),%rax# > 2c1912b <_fini@@xul45a1+0x1d803> I would be grateful if you could try again using the master branch. Dhole made diffoscope compare ELF sections individually and I wonder how much it helped with this problem. If it doesn't, would you be so kind to provide example binaries? Thanks, -- Lunar.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#808197: diffoscope: readelf --debug-dump can be brutal
Control: tag -1 + pending Mike Hommey: > However, if each debug section was compared individually, that give more > chance for diffoscope to work. (--debug-dump takes values allowing to treat > each debug section independently) Implemented by Dhole and currently available in the master branch. -- Lunar.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Processed: Re: Bug#808197: diffoscope: readelf --debug-dump can be brutal
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + pending Bug #808197 [src:diffoscope] diffoscope: readelf --debug-dump can be brutal Added tag(s) pending. -- 808197: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808197 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Processed (with 5 errors): Re: [diffoscope] [PATCH] Implement ElfFile as a container of sections
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 808197 + pending Bug #808197 [src:diffoscope] diffoscope: readelf --debug-dump can be brutal Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #808197 to the same tags previously set > Mike, FYI… Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > On Montag, 18. Januar 2016, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > > Dhole: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > > > This works perfectly :) I've implemented it in the revision I'm Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > > > attaching. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 808197: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808197 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#808267: diffoscope: Redundant information in ELF comparisons
Hi Mike, Mike Hommey: > When comparing ELF files, the following commands are used: > - readelf --all > - readelf --debug-dump > - objdump --disassemble --full-contents > > objdump --disassemble --full-contents is actually redundant in itself. For > example, it will dump both an hexdump and a disassembly of the .text section. > It's also redundant with the output of readelf --debug-dump because it does an > hexdump of the .debug_* sections that readelf --debug-dump does a dwarf dump > of. The master branch now compare ELF files section by section. If you could test it and see if there's still redundancies, I would be grateful. Thanks! -- Lunar.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Your message to Pbuilder-maint awaits moderator approval
Your mail to 'Pbuilder-maint' with the subject reproducible.debian.net status changes for pbuilder Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Message has implicit destination Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/confirm/pbuilder-maint/092dc8da936b44d89eb86db2f06e9cff835de71a ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#808207: diffoscope: Filter objdump --disassemble output before diffing it
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 07:06:14PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Hi Mike!
>
> Mike Hommey:
> > When comparing large ELF binaries, some minor differences can end up hurting
> > the visibility of more important differences.
> >
> > Specifically, objdump --disassemble displays symbols+offsets for addresses
> > it derives from IP-relative addressing, like the following:
> >
> >9d2be2: 48 8d 05 42 65 24 02lea0x2246542(%rip),%rax#
> > 2c1912b <_fini@@xul45a1+0x1d803>
>
> I would be grateful if you could try again using the master branch.
> Dhole made diffoscope compare ELF sections individually and I wonder how
> much it helped with this problem.
I don't think it changed anything.
> If it doesn't, would you be so kind to provide example binaries?
I can't find the differing binary anymore :( But that can be reproduced
with a small testcase:
$ cat < test.c
extern const int qux;
int bar() {
#ifdef FOO
return qux * 2;
#else
return qux;
#endif
}
EOF
$ cat < test2.c
const int qux = 2;
EOF
$ gcc -shared -o /tmp/test.so /tmp/test{,2}.c -fPIC
$ gcc -shared -o /tmp/test2.so /tmp/test{,2}.c -fPIC -DFOO
$ strip test{,2}.so
$ diffoscope --text - /tmp/test*.so
(...)
│ @@ -29,56 +29,57 @@
│ 5a2:48 89 e5mov%rsp,%rbp
│ 5a5:48 c1 fe 03 sar$0x3,%rsi
│ 5a9:48 89 f0mov%rsi,%rax
│ 5ac:48 c1 e8 3f shr$0x3f,%rax
│ 5b0:48 01 c6add%rax,%rsi
│ 5b3:48 d1 fesar%rsi
│ 5b6:74 18 je 5d0 <_init@@Base+0xc8>
│ - 5b8:48 8b 05 01 03 20 00mov0x200301(%rip),%rax#
2008c0
│ + 5b8:48 8b 05 01 03 20 00mov0x200301(%rip),%rax#
2008c0
│ 5bf:48 85 c0test %rax,%rax
│ 5c2:74 0c je 5d0 <_init@@Base+0xc8>
│ 5c4:5d pop%rbp
│ 5c5:ff e0 jmpq *%rax
│ 5c7:66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
│ 5ce:00 00
│ 5d0:5d pop%rbp
│ 5d1:c3 retq
│ 5d2:0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
│ 5d6:66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
│ 5dd:00 00 00
│ 5e0:80 3d 09 03 20 00 00cmpb $0x0,0x200309(%rip)#
2008f0 <_edata@@Base>
│ 5e7:75 27 jne610 <_init@@Base+0x108>
│ - 5e9:48 83 3d d7 02 20 00cmpq $0x0,0x2002d7(%rip)#
2008c8
│ + 5e9:48 83 3d d7 02 20 00cmpq $0x0,0x2002d7(%rip)#
2008c8
│ 5f0:00
│ 5f1:55 push %rbp
│ 5f2:48 89 e5mov%rsp,%rbp
│ 5f5:74 0c je 603 <_init@@Base+0xfb>
│ - 5f7:48 8b 3d ea 02 20 00mov0x2002ea(%rip),%rdi#
2008e8
│ + 5f7:48 8b 3d ea 02 20 00mov0x2002ea(%rip),%rdi#
2008e8
│ 5fe:e8 45 ff ff ff callq 548 <_init@@Base+0x40>
│ 603:e8 48 ff ff ff callq 550 <_init@@Base+0x48>
│ 608:5d pop%rbp
│ 609:c6 05 e0 02 20 00 01movb $0x1,0x2002e0(%rip)#
2008f0 <_edata@@Base>
│ 610:f3 c3 repz retq
│ 612:0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
│ 616:66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
│ 61d:00 00 00
│ - 620:48 8d 3d e1 00 20 00lea0x2000e1(%rip),%rdi#
200708
│ + 620:48 8d 3d e1 00 20 00lea0x2000e1(%rip),%rdi#
200708
│ 627:48 83 3f 00 cmpq $0x0,(%rdi)
│ 62b:75 0b jne638 <_init@@Base+0x130>
│ 62d:e9 5e ff ff ff jmpq 590 <_init@@Base+0x88>
│ 632:66 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
│ - 638:48 8b 05 79 02 20 00mov0x200279(%rip),%rax#
2008b8
│ + 638:48 8b 05 79 02 20 00mov0x200279(%rip),%rax#
2008b8
│ 63f:48 85 c0test %rax,%rax
│ 642:74 e9 je 62d <_init@@Base+0x125>
│ 644:55 push %rbp
│ 645:48 89 e5mov%rsp,%rbp
│ 648:ff d0 callq *%rax
│ 64a:5d pop%rbp
│ 64b:e9 40 ff ff ff jmpq 590 <_init@@Base+0x88>
│
│ 0650 :
│ 650:55 push %rbp
│ 651:48 89 e5mov%rsp,%rbp
│ - 654:48 8b 05 4d 02 20 00mov
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#808267: diffoscope: Redundant information in ELF comparisons
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 07:20:38PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Mike Hommey:
> > When comparing ELF files, the following commands are used:
> > - readelf --all
> > - readelf --debug-dump
> > - objdump --disassemble --full-contents
> >
> > objdump --disassemble --full-contents is actually redundant in itself. For
> > example, it will dump both an hexdump and a disassembly of the .text
> > section.
> > It's also redundant with the output of readelf --debug-dump because it does
> > an
> > hexdump of the .debug_* sections that readelf --debug-dump does a dwarf dump
> > of.
>
> The master branch now compare ELF files section by section. If you could
> test it and see if there's still redundancies, I would be grateful.
It seems better, but there's still redundancy at least between `readelf
--wide --all` and `readelf --wide --hex-dump
{.symtab,.note.gnu-build-id,.rela.dyn,.rela.plt,.dynamic,.dynsym}` and other
sections ; just check the list of sections in the output of readelf
--all.
Reading the code suggests debug sections would also be redunded between
--debug-dump and --hex-dump for the individual sections, but I haven't
tested with binaries with debuginfo.
Mike
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
