Source: gerstensaft
Version: 0.3-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that gerstensaft could not
Source: integrit
Version: 4.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that integrit could not be bui
Source: uruk
Version:20150401-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that uruk could not be built r
Source: xbs
Version: 0-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that xbs could not be built reproduci
Source: freecdb
Version: 0.75
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that freecdb could not be built
Source: ipsvd
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that ipsvd could not be built r
Source: jargon
Version: 4.0.0-5.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that jargon could not be bui
Source: skalibs
Version: 0.47-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that skalibs could not be buil
Source: cgoban
Version: 1.9.14-17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that cgoban could not be bui
Source: gpsmanshp
Version: 1.2.3-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that gpsmanshp could not be
Source: angband-doc
Version: 3.0.3.5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that angband-doc could no
Source: beav
Version: 1:1.40-18
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that beav could not be built r
Source: bcron
Version: 0.10-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that bcron could not be built re
Source: abook
Version: 0.6.0~pre2-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that abook could not be bu
Source: daemontools
Version: 1:0.76-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that daemontools could n
Source: console-cyrillic
Version: 0.9-16.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that console-cyrill
Source: blosxom
Version: 2.1.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that blosxom could not be bui
Source: chiark-utils
Version: 4.4.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that chiark-utils could n
Source: checkpw
Version: 1.02-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that checkpw could not be bu
Source: cgilib
Version: 0.6-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that cgilib could not be built r
Source: debdelta
Version: 0.55
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that debdelta could not be buil
Source: dropbear
Version: 2014.65-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that dropbear could not b
# for the bugs I just submitted
#
retitle 793002 cgilib: please make the mtimes reproducible
retitle 793001 blosxom: please make the mtimes reproducible
retitle 793000 beav: please make the mtimes reproducible
retitle 792999 console-cyrillic: please make the mtimes reproducible
retitle 792998 chiar
Hello,
This week I have been working on packages which are marked as affected
by not_using_dh_builddeb [1].
Patches were submitted for the following packages:
- Package: abook
https://bugs.debian.org/792995
- Package: angband
https://bugs.debian.org/792994
- Package: argus-client
https://bugs.
Hi,
On 07/21/2015 01:06 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Sorry in advance if this sounds like nitpicking - I notice that a lot of
> these patches use BUILD_DATE instead of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. Any reason for the
> difference?
I used this fix because it was specified in the description here
https://reprodu
Source: leave
Version: 1.12-2.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that leave could not be built
Source: libtnt
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that libtnt could not be built
Source: joe
Version: 3.7-2.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that joe could not be built repro
Source: magicfilter
Version: 1.2-64
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that magicfilter could not
Source: lpe
Version: 1.2.7-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that lpe could not be built repro
Source: mailfront
Version: 1.16-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that mailfront could not be
Source: markdown
Version: 1.0.1-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that markdown could not be b
Source: mailto
Version: 1.3.2-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that mailto could not be built
Source: mimefilter
Version: 1.7+nmu1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that mimefilter could not
Source: ldapvi
Version: 1.7-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that ldapvi could not be built r
Source: mime-support
Version: 3.58
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that mime-support could not
Source: mpack
Version: 1.6-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that mpack could not be built rep
Source: netris
Version: 0.52-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that netris could not be built
Source: nitpic
Version: 0.1-15
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that nitpic could not be built
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl4-18
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that pixmap could not be bui
Source: postfix-gld
Version: 1.7-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that postfix-gld could not
Source: qmail-run
Version: 2.0.2+nmu1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that qmail-run could not
Source: ratfor
Version: 1.0-15
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that ratfor could not be built
Source: rbootd
Version: 2.0-10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that rbootd could not be built
Source: rockdodger
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that rockdodger could not
Source: rsbackup
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that rsbackup could not be bui
Source: sauce
Version: 0.9.0+nmu3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that sauce could not be buil
Source: rungetty
Version: 1.2-15
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that rungetty could not be bu
Source: sgmltools-lite
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that s
Source: sendfile
Version: 2.1b.20080616-5.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that sendfile coul
Source: signify
Version: 1.14-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that signify could not be buil
Source: socklog
Version: 2.1.0-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that socklog could not be bui
Source: slrnface
Version: 2.1.1-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that slrnface could not be b
Source: ssmtp
Version: 2.64-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that ssmtp could not be built re
Source: taggrepper
Version: 0.05-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that taggrepper could not b
Source: tinydyndns
Version: 0.4.2.debian1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that tinydyndns co
Source: tetradraw
Version: 2.0.3-8.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that tetradraw could not
Source: supercat
Version: 0.5.5-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that supercat could not be b
Source: trscripts
Version: 1.16
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that trscripts could not be bu
Source: the
Version: 3.3~rc1-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that the could not be built rep
Source: netmaze
Version: 0.81+jpg0.82-14.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that netmaze could
Hello,
This week I have been working on packages which are marked as affected
by not_using_dh_builddeb [1].
Patches were submitted for the following packages:
- Package: joe
https://bugs.debian.org/793696
- Package: ldapvi
https://bugs.debian.org/793702
- Package: leave
https://bugs.debian.org
Hi!
While working as part of the Debian reproducible builds team [1] we have
noticed that 30 globus-* packages are affected by timestamps in manpages
generated by doxygen [2].
The reproducible builds team is building packages using a version of
doxygen which has been patched to honour the environ
Source: libsyncml
Version: 0.5.4-2.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that libsyncml could not
Source: zipios++
Version: 0.1.5.9+cvs.2007.04.28-5.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that zipi
Source: cdbs
Version: 0.4.130
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
The Debian reproducible builds team [1] recently proposed a new
environment variable $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
Hello,
This week I have been working on the following problems:
1- Packages which are marked as affected by
timestamps_in_manpages_generated_by_doxygen [1]:
Patches were submitted for the following packages:
- Package: libsyncml
https://bugs.debian.org/794225
- Package: zipios++
https://bugs.d
Source: camitk
Version: 3.4.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that camitk could not be built
Source: gperf
Version: 3.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.5
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi,
Your packages contains an embedded code copy of texi2html which is
copyright Lionel Cons and others and is licensed under the GPL and
Creative Comm
Source: maxima
Version: 5.36.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.5
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Your packages contains an embedded code copy of texi2html which is
copyright Lionel Con
Source: python-xlib
Version: 0.14+20091101-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.5
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Your packages contains an embedded code copy of texi2html which is
copyrigh
Hello,
This week I have been working on the following problems:
1. doxygen
---
There was a new Debian doxygen release in unstable so I refreshed the
version in the reproducible builds git repository and package repository.
This took a bit longer because of the current libstdc++6 transit
Hi,
On 07/14/2015 12:39 AM, Karl Berry wrote:
> Thanh is away for ~3 weeks. He will review both the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
> patch (which I suspect will be fine) and Nicolas's other comments when
> he's back.
In addition to my patch to honour $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH please find
attached an additional patc
man2html_1.6g-7.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailma
doxygen_1.8.9.1-4.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mail
texlive-bin_2015.20150524.37493-5.1~reproducible2.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.
101 - 176 of 176 matches
Mail list logo