[Reproducible-builds] not_using_dh_builddeb

2015-08-29 Thread Santiago Vila 
Greetings.

I'd like this issue to be called differently.

Even if I'm a fan of dh these days, issues should better have a
neutral name and be called by the observed *effect* on the resulting
binary packages, not by the desired fix in the source package.

Suggestion:

varying_mtimes_in_data_tar_gz_or_control_tar_gz

Thanks.

___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Re: [Reproducible-builds] not_using_dh_builddeb

2015-08-29 Thread Holger Levsen 
Hi Santiago,

On Samstag, 29. August 2015, Santiago Vila wrote:
 I'd like this issue to be called differently.
 
 Even if I'm a fan of dh these days, issues should better have a
 neutral name and be called by the observed *effect* on the resulting
 binary packages, not by the desired fix in the source package.
 
 Suggestion:
 
 varying_mtimes_in_data_tar_gz_or_control_tar_gz

agreed. please go ahead. maybe just call it 
varying_mtimes_in_data_or_control_tar_gz though - but I leave the exact color 
of the bikeshed to you :)


cheers,
Holger




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds