Hi,
On Dienstag, 26. Mai 2015, Andrew Ayer wrote:
> That said, I'm now concerned about how strip-nondeterminism interacts
> with the package-contains-timestamped-gzip tag. At some point after
> package-contains-timestamped-gzip was first proposed, we reproducible
> builds folks decided that inste
On 2015-05-26 20:35, Andrew Ayer wrote:
> tags 785742 + pending
> thanks
>
> On Tue, 19 May 2015 20:56:17 +0200
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> Debugging the lintian FTBFS on reproducible.d.n[1], I have found that
>> if I override on dh_strip-nondeterminism in the test's rules file, the
>> unexpecte
tags 785742 + pending
thanks
On Tue, 19 May 2015 20:56:17 +0200
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Debugging the lintian FTBFS on reproducible.d.n[1], I have found that
> if I override on dh_strip-nondeterminism in the test's rules file, the
> unexpected package-contains-timestamped-gzip tag goes away.
>
>
Package: dh-strip-nondeterminism
Version: 0.005-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
Debugging the lintian FTBFS on reproducible.d.n[1], I have found that
if I override on dh_strip-nondeterminism in the test's rules file, the
unexpected package-contains-timestamped-gzip tag goes away.
In general, all gzip fil
