[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 9: Move forward reproducible builds

2015-07-27 Thread Maria Valentina Marin
Hello, This week I have been working on packages which are marked as affected by not_using_dh_builddeb [1]. Patches were submitted for the following packages: - Package: joe https://bugs.debian.org/793696 - Package: ldapvi https://bugs.debian.org/793702 - Package: leave https://bugs.debian.org

Re: [Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 9: Move forward reproducible builds

2015-07-25 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 05:24:50PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Samstag, 25. Juli 2015, Dhole wrote: > [...] > > I have also uploaded the package in our APT repository. > [...] > > For next week I plan to send the ghostscript patches to debian and probably > > upstream[...] > > I'm aware that

Re: [Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 9: Move forward reproducible builds

2015-07-25 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Dhole, thanks for your continious reports and cheers and kudos for all the nice work! Besides thinking "yay" this sparked one question: On Samstag, 25. Juli 2015, Dhole wrote: [...] > I have also uploaded the package in our APT repository. [...] > For next week I plan to send the ghostscript

[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 9: Move forward reproducible builds

2015-07-25 Thread Dhole
Hi, This week I have patched the two remaining packages tagged by the issue timestamps_difference_by_unzip [1], plus another one also affected by this issue which wasn't tagged: - torbutton https://bugs.debian.org/793126 - pdf.js https://bugs.debian.org/793127 - deejayd https://bugs.d