Re: [Reproducible-builds] Wrong version displayed for gcin in reproducible status page

2015-09-14 Thread Mattia Rizzolo 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:37:25PM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 05:36:58PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Now the package is in "uncategorized state", which means it fails to
> > build reproducibly but we don't know the exact reason, so it will need
> > to be investigated.
> > 
> > If you have some idea why this package does not build reproducibly,
> > we can write a new note for it.
> > 
> > (Or you could also join us and write the note yourself :-).
> 
> I will investigate it, but how can I join the team and update the note?


Just ask to join the alioth team, you'll get commit access to the git
repository.
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/reproducible

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org  : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

[Reproducible-builds] Wrong version displayed for gcin in reproducible status page

2015-09-13 Thread ChangZhuo Chen 
Hi,

The left column of reproducible status for gcin [0] displays gcin
version as 2.8.3+dfsg1-6. However, if we clikc the link for detail
result, the version annotated is actual 2.8.2+dfsg1-1.

[0] https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/testing/amd64/gcin.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Wrong version displayed for gcin in reproducible status page

2015-09-13 Thread ChangZhuo Chen 
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 05:36:58PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:13:09AM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
> > The left column of reproducible status for gcin [0] displays gcin
> > version as 2.8.3+dfsg1-6. However, if we clikc the link for detail
> > result, the version annotated is actual 2.8.2+dfsg1-1.
> > 
> > [0] https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/testing/amd64/gcin.html
> 
> This is normal and expected (to some degree) because notes are updated
> by hand (the version you see there is like the "Version" field in
> the Debian BTS).
> 
> In this case, the note was wrong because it said the package had an issue
> which is now fixed. I've just removed the note to fix that.

Thank for the help.

> Now the package is in "uncategorized state", which means it fails to
> build reproducibly but we don't know the exact reason, so it will need
> to be investigated.
> 
> If you have some idea why this package does not build reproducibly,
> we can write a new note for it.
> 
> (Or you could also join us and write the note yourself :-).

I will investigate it, but how can I join the team and update the note?

> 
> Thanks.

-- 
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) 
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896  C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds