Am 26. Mai 2015 14:57:13 MESZ, schrieb "Jérémy Bobbio" :
>I've scheduled another test for the version in experimental, and it now
>builds reproducibly! :)
>
>https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/experimental/amd64/ghc.html
\o/
___
Reproducible-buil
Joachim Breitner:
> it seems that the GHC build builds some auxiliary binaries (e.g. unlit,
> hp2hs) with the bootstrapping compiler, so for a chance of a fully
> reproducible build, the ghc package used needs to be fixed as well. That
> should be the case with ghc-7.8.4-7, uploaded to unstable tod
Hi,
Am Montag, den 25.05.2015, 18:00 +0200 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
> > Why does it build ghc-dbgsym at all? I do not define that in
> > debian/rules. And
> > https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain does
> > not mention a change in that direction either.
>
> We use the pat
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:19:14AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
Hi there!
> Why does it build ghc-dbgsym at all? I do not define that in
> debian/rules. And
> https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain does
> not mention a change in that direction either.
We use the
[Please CC me on replies, I’m not subscribed.]
Hi,
still staring at the debbindiff of
https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/experimental/amd64/ghc.html
I wonder:
Why does it build ghc-dbgsym at all? I do not define that in
debian/rules. And
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Experimenta
