Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. April 2015, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
The documentation generated by javadoc includes a build dependent
timestamp.
The attached patch tells javadoc to not include a timestamp in the
documentation.
while this works, javadoc should really be taught not to include those
[removing the bug from the recipients list...]
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Reiner Herrmann rei...@reiner-h.de wrote:
On 05/01/2015 11:30 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
That said, according to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInDocumentationGeneratedByJavadoc
On 05/01/2015 11:30 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. April 2015, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
The documentation generated by javadoc includes a build dependent
timestamp.
The attached patch tells javadoc to not include a timestamp in the
documentation.
while this works,
Hi Reiner,
On Freitag, 1. Mai 2015, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
I totally agree. :-)
While looking at this issue I saw that javahelper passes -notimestamp to
javadoc by default now. I don't think there are that many packages calling
javadoc directly. But of course the best would be if javadoc
On 05/01/2015 01:46 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
[removing the bug from the recipients list...]
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Reiner Herrmann rei...@reiner-h.de wrote:
On 05/01/2015 11:30 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
That said, according to
