[Reproducible-builds] checking that build succeeds in "funny" paths like .../1:2.3+4~5-6/...

2015-06-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
(please keep me Cc:ed, I'm not subscribed) Hi, while your are doing rebuilds to check reproducibility, maybe you could also check that the packages build in a path that contains all chars that are allowed in version numbers. IIRC I had seen failures to do so twice quite recently, one was beignet,

[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 4: Move forward reproducible builds

2015-06-21 Thread Dhole
Hi, On the beginning of the week I improved two patches I had sent on the previous week upon Lunar's suggestion. They are the following: - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788747 - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788752 On both cases the inital patch removed the

[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 4: Move forward reproducible builds

2015-06-21 Thread marivalen
Hello, I have been working on packages which are marked as affected by timestamps_in_documentation_generated_by_doxygen [1]. Patches were submitted for the following packages: The following packages suffer from having HTML_TIMESTAMP set to YES: - Package: elektra https://bugs.debian.org/788879