Hi Clint,
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015, Clint Adams wrote:
> No, the point is that if someone rebuilds a package with Recommends
> installed, a different .deb can be produced from what the buildds would
> produce in clean, Recommends-less chroots. This seemed to me to be within
> the scope of your p
Source: gigedit
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build:
.../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.s
Source: geeqie
Version: 1:1.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build:
exiv2.o: In function `exif_add_value_t
Source: cucumber
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build:
/usr/bin/ruby2.1 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb -r json
Source: fracplanet
Version: 0.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build:
obj/fracplanet.o: In function
`boost::pr
Hi Vagrant,
On Samstag, 1. August 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> But wait, there's more:
> cbxi4pro-armhf-rb.debian.net:
hehe, nice, thanks, I'm configuring that one now too..! :-)
> It is considerably more capable, sure. The individual cores on the
> Banana PI might be a little more powerful,
Source: classified-ads
Version: 0.07-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that classified-ads cou
debbindiff_28_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debbindiff_28.dsc
debbindiff_28.tar.gz
debbindiff_28_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
Reproducible-bui
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 17:21:52 +0200
Source: debbindiff
Binary: debbindiff
Architecture: source all
Version: 28
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks
Changed-By: Jérémy Bobbio
Descripti
Your message dated Sun, 02 Aug 2015 15:34:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794347: fixed in debbindiff 28
has caused the Debian Bug report #794347,
regarding "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'add_details'"
while processing dh-ocaml_1.0.9_amd64.changes
to be marked
Hi,
https://reproducible.debian.net/index_repositories.html now shows missing
armhf binaries too, so we can see which binNMUs we need to do...
Next thing to do: fix dpkg as described in
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20150727/002569.html
You might also
Source: clhep
Version: 2.1.4.1-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: locale
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that clhep could not be built r
Source: parsec47
Version: 0.2.dfsg1-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: locale
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that parsec47 could not be b
Source: tumiki-fighters
Version: 0.2.dfsg1-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: locale
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that tumiki-fighters
debbindiff_28.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reprodu
Your message dated Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:20:29 +
with message-id <2015080029.ga21...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#786596: still unicode problems:
'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 64-65: ordinal not in
range(128)
has caused the Debian Bug
At some point we're hopefully going to support Secure Boot on amd64.
That means there will be a signed kernel image (separate from the
current linux-image packages) and a signed GRUB image. The kernel
modules in the linux-image packages will also be signed, probably with
an ephemeral key.
All the
17 matches
Mail list logo