Re: [Reproducible-builds] .buildinfo should contain source hashes (as well as binary hashes)

2015-09-21 Thread Ximin Luo
On 20/09/15 20:43, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Ximin Luo: >> With our current .buildinfo setup, the above process is more >> complicated, because we *only* store hashes of the binary build >> environment. > > [..] > > The idea to put a hash of the binary package in the > Build-Environment is a late

Re: [Reproducible-builds] .buildinfo should contain source hashes (as well as binary hashes)

2015-09-21 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Ximin Luo: > > Implementation-wise, getting the hash of the .dsc in the .buildinfo is > > going to be very tricky. dpkg does not know about what's available in > > the archive. It just knows about packages which are or were installed. > > > > `apt-cache showsrc [pkg]` has the right information

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#799410: segment: please make the build reproducible

2015-09-21 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:40:44PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: segment > Version: 1.3.5~svn57+dfsg-1.1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: timestamps > X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hi, > >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] .buildinfo should contain source hashes (as well as binary hashes)

2015-09-21 Thread Ximin Luo
On 20/09/15 19:22, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Hi, > > Quoting Ximin Luo (2015-09-20 18:49:16) >> Currently, to run a DDC test, we would have to read the buildinfo file, find >> the hashes of the binary build-deps, lookup the source packages that >> corresponds to these hashes, find a different

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#799410: segment: please make the build reproducible

2015-09-21 Thread Chris Lamb
> I think it would be even better if we stopped using build dates > altogether, > i.e. considering them to be irrelevant. Of course, but that involves diverging from upstream. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#799690: file: regression in MIME encoding lookups

2015-09-21 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Package: file Version: 1:5.25-1 Severity: important Hi! The latest upload of file broke diffoscope test suite. With file/1:5.24-2: $ file --mime-encoding tests/data/binary1 tests/data/binary1: binary With file/1:5.25-1: $ file --mime-encoding tests/data/binary1

[Reproducible-builds] package uploaded to our repo

2015-09-21 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
dpkg_1.18.3.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#799410: segment: please make the build reproducible

2015-09-21 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:21:16PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > I think it would be even better if we stopped using build dates > > altogether, > > i.e. considering them to be irrelevant. > > Of course, but that involves diverging from upstream. Well, it depends. My theory is that stop using

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#799410: segment: please make the build reproducible

2015-09-21 Thread Chris Lamb
> > Of course, but that involves diverging from upstream. > > Well, it depends. > > My theory is that stop using the build date is what a sensible > upstream would do, so we would not be diverging, just "anticipating", > since we would move in the same direction. I share your discomfort re. the

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of diffoscope_35_amd64.changes

2015-09-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
diffoscope_35_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_35.dsc diffoscope_35.tar.xz debbindiff_35_all.deb diffoscope_35_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

[Reproducible-builds] diffoscope_35_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-09-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:23:56 + Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope debbindiff Architecture: source all Version: 35 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of diffoscope_35_amd64.changes

2015-09-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
diffoscope_35_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: diffoscope_35.dsc diffoscope_35.tar.xz debbindiff_35_all.deb diffoscope_35_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#799656: node-websocket: FTBFS: error: 'NanScope' was not declared in this scope

2015-09-21 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: node-websocket Version: 1.0.19-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, node-websocket fails to build from source in

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#799657: python-admesh: FTBFS: admesh.c:1391:47: error: type of formal parameter 1 is incomplete

2015-09-21 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: python-admesh Version: 0.98.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, python-admesh fails to build from source in

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#799658: krecipes: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on libsoprano-dev

2015-09-21 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: krecipes Version: 2.0~beta2-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, krecipes fails to build from source due to missing