Source: libdist-zilla-plugins-cjm-perl
Version: 4.27-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
libdist-zilla-plugins-cjm-perl fails to b
Hi Chris,
> ie. src:nfs is currently reproducible on all our platform/dist combinations.
> Hope that helps. :)
Thank you, this is re-assuring!
Stefan
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.
Source: filepp
Version: 1.8.0-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps toolchain
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that filepp generates unrep
Source: phpab
Version: 1.21.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that phpab could not be built reprodu
Source: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 0.9.3.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: fileordering
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that apt-cacher-ng could n
Source: vips
Version: 8.3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that vips could not be built reproducib
Hi,
I used diffoscope to find a bug when gedit is compiled in parallel.[1]
I think we'll be switching quite a few GNOME packages over to dh
compat 10 soon with parallel building enabled by default.
Do you have any suggestions for how we could easily automate building
a bunch of packages with and
Dear Jeremy,
Thanks for getting in touch; glad you are finding diffoscope useful!
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/770100
Very interesting bug; thanks for sharing.
> Going a step further, maybe reproducible-builds.org should do this
> check since it seems it would be relatively easy to implement th
Source: python-oslo.config
Version: 1:3.9.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
python-oslo.config fails to build from source in u
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Very interesting bug; thanks for sharing.
I noticed that bug a while ago, so gedit in unstable/testing currently
explicitly opts out of parallel building.
> However, I may be misunderstanding your query as the tests we run as part
> of reprodu
> I propose that one of the builds disable parallelism entirely
So, just to be 100% clear, simply varying DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=X"
would not have discovered this gedit bug? (Related, our list of variations
between the builds can be viewed online[0])
> I want to go ahead and push parallel-bu
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> So, just to be 100% clear, simply varying DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=X"
> would not have discovered this gedit bug? (Related, our list of variations
> between the builds can be viewed online[0])
I don't know, but the difference between paralle
Source: gkrellm
Version: 2.3.7-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: shell
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that gkrellm could not be built reproduci
Source: gkrellm
Version: 2.3.7-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: umask
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that gkrellm could not be built reproduci
Source: uhub
Version: 0.4.1-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: umask
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that uhub could not be built reproducibly.
> I understand that building with parallel disabled takes much longer
> for many packages so I don't know if this is just a lack of resources
It's more that we have two builds and I think (?) we would prefer to do
different values of N > 1. So a different kind of resource problem.
> I think it wo
Source: dicom3tools
Version: 1.00~20160610072711-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that dicom3tools c
Source: tuxpaint-config
Version: 0.0.13-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that tuxpaint-config could
18 matches
Mail list logo
