[Reproducible-builds] Bug#826162: slime: please make the contributors ordering locale-independent (environment)

2016-06-02 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
ur current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds Description: Reproducible contributors list Always use C locale when sorting contributors, to make the build reproducible Author: Alexis Bienvenüe <p...@passoire.fr> ---

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#827115: netpbm: please honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to allow reproducible output

2016-06-12 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
t variable [2]. See the attached patch for a proposed solution. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -u netpbm-free-10.0/debian/changelog netpbm-free-10.0/debian/changelog --- netpbm-free-1

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#826951: slicot: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-06-10 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
ve noticed that 'slicot' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the order files are passed to `ar'. Once applied, slicot can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru slicot-5.

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#827172: reaver: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-06-13 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
ve noticed that 'reaver' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the order in which object files are passed to gcc. Once applied, reaver can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds D

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#827197: gnuplot: please make the build reproducible (timestamps, username, environment)

2016-06-13 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
ur current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru gnuplot-5.0.3+dfsg3/debian/changelog gnuplot-5.0.3+dfsg3/debian/changelog --- gnuplot-5.0.3+dfsg3/debian/changelog 2016-0

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#827187: latex2html: please make the output reproducible (toolchain, timestamps, username, randomness)

2016-06-13 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru latex2html-2015-debian1/debian/changelog latex2html-2015-debian1/debian/changelog --- latex2html-2015-debian1/debian/changelog 2016-01-19 19:24:18

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#827361: matplotlib: please honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to allow reproducible output

2016-06-15 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
le [2], so that the sources last modification date can be used for the timestamps in these PS and PDF files. See the attached patch for a proposed solution. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#826093: osc: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-06-02 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'osc' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch honours the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable [2] to get a reproducible man page date from the last debian changelog entry. Once applied, osc can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#825436: gettext: please make xgettext honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2016-05-26 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
timestamp will be set from the last debian/changelog entry instead of the (unreproducible) build date. See the attached patch for a solution to this issue. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch

Re: [Reproducible-builds] dropping texlive from our archive

2016-06-01 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
ich includes a date that is build from these primitives : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-tex/texlive-bin.git/tree/texk/web2c/xetexdir/xetex.web#n13872 So solution 3 should include a bugfix to make xetex's Creator string either strip the build date either honour S_D_E. Regards, Alex

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#827864: funtools: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-06-21 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
], we have noticed that 'funtools' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the order in which object files are passed to mklib. Once applied, funtools can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/Reproduc

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#827731: tin: please make the build reproducible (locale)

2016-06-20 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
is to drop cpp_reprtime -- see attached patch. Once applied, tin can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2]: https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru tin-2.3.2/debian

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#828627: uim: please make the build reproducible (locale)

2016-06-26 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds Description: Use LC_ALL instead of LANG bacause LC_ALL overwrites LANG. This makes the build reproducible. Author: Alexis Bienvenüe <p...@passoire.fr> --- uim-1.8.6+gh20160621.0.87bf935.orig/tables/Mak

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820240: lua-ldoc: please honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2016-04-06 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
environment variable [2]. See the attached patch for a solution to this issue. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru lua-ldoc-1.4.3/debian/changelog lua-ldoc-1.4.3/debian/changelog --- lua

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820144: rdtool: please honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2016-04-05 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
for a proposed solution. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru rdtool-0.6.38/debian/changelog rdtool-0.6.38/debian/changelog --- rdtool-0.6.38/debian/changelog 2014-09-09 11:16:13.0

[Reproducible-builds] lua-ldoc --date/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2016-04-06 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
. This would be more reliable, but maybe lua-ldoc will get a little messy/muddled? Thanks for your advice, Alexis Bienvenüe. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820183: cython: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-06 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'cython' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch uses debian changelog last entry's year as copyright year in the documentation (through SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH). Once applied, cython can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820148: autopkgtest: please make the build reproducible (environment)

2016-04-05 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
can solve this issue, so that autopkgtest can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru autopkgtest-3.20.1/Makefile autopkgtest-3.20.1.0~reproducible1/Makefile --- autopkgtest-3.20.1/Makefile

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820152: anope: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-05 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes build date from the version string. Once applied, anope can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru anope-2.0.3/debian/patches/series

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820869: pyexiv2: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-13 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'pyexiv2' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch honours the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable through the ustrftime function, to get a reproducible copyright year. Once applied, pyexiv2 can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820815: freefem++: please make the build reproducible (fileordering, timestamps)

2016-04-12 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2]: https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru freefem++-3.45/debian/changelog freefem++-3.45/debian/changelog --- freefem++-3.45/debian/changelog 2016-03-19 23:24:48.0 +0100 +++ freefem++-3.45

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820895: sphinx: please extend SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support

2016-04-13 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
can be built reproducibly without any change. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru sphinx-1.3.6/debian/changelog sphinx-1.3.6/debian/changelog --- sphinx-1.3.6/debian/changelog 2016-03-03

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820435: asciidoctor: please honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2016-04-08 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
for a proposed solution. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru asciidoctor-1.5.4/debian/changelog asciidoctor-1.5.4/debian/changelog --- asciidoctor-1.5.4/debian/changelog 2016-02-29 20:11

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820457: recode: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-08 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
in the documentation is taken from the last debian/changelog entry. Once applied, recode can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru recode-3.6/debian/changelog recode-3.6/debian/changelog --- recode-3.6

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820522: gtkspell: please make the build reproducible (environment)

2016-04-09 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'gtkspell' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the SHELL used in the examples/Makefile to /bin/sh instead of current one. Once applied, gtkspell can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820684: fop: please make the build reproducible (username, hostname, timestamps, locale)

2016-04-11 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru fop-2.1/debian/changelog fop-2.1/debian/changelog --- fop-2.1/debian/changelog 2016-02-15 08:56:48.0 +0100 +++ fop-2.1/debian/changelog 2016-04-11 13:51:45.0 +0200

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820809: wsdl4j: please make the build reproducible (environment)

2016-04-12 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'wsdl4j' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch use a plain text representation of the copyright character in the build.xml file, to avoid encoding issues with javadoc. Once applied, wsdl4j can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820603: viking: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-04-10 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that 'viking' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes icon headers inclusion order. Once applied, viking can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820668: sawfish: please make the build reproducible (fileordering, timestamps, username, hostname)

2016-04-11 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru sawfish-1.11/debian/changelog sawfish-1.11/debian/changelog --- sawfish-1.11/debian/changelog 2016-03-19 18:05:17.0 +0100 +++ sawfish

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820179: aodh: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-06 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes build date from documentation. Once applied, aodh can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru aodh-1.0.0/debian/changelog aodh-1.0.0

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820741: sim4: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-04-11 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'sim4' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the order in which C files are compiled. Once applied, sim4 can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru sim4

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820742: gmic: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-11 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'gmic' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch strips the build date from help messages. Once applied, gmic can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru gmic-1.6.8/debian/changelog

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#819915: kannel: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-03 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
by a fixed date. Once applied, and once bugs #819911 and #819914 regarding transfig and imagemagick will be resolved in the experimental toolchain, kannel can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#819921: basket: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-03 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
noticed that 'basket' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes build date from debug info. Once applied, basket can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru basket-2.10

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#819948: maude: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-04 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes build date from the banner. Once applied, maude can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru maude-2.7/debian/changelog maude-2.7/debian

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820072: synfig: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-05 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes build date from info output. Once applied, synfig can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru synfig-1.0.2/debian/patches/series

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Best approach to strip timestamp in postscript files

2016-03-31 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Hi. Le 31/03/2016 18:35, Dhole a écrit : > I believe the best option would be to make 'convert' honour the > environment variable SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH when defined, when embedding > the CreationDate tag. Thanks for your very clear advice. I prepared a patch for this [1]. I tested that the convert

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Best approach to strip timestamp in postscript files

2016-04-01 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
nced, can anyone have a look at these patches and help me to improve them or to find them their way? Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] http://docs.passoire.fr/alexis/debian/imagemagick_6.8.9.9-7_SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.diff http://docs.passoire.fr/alexis/debian/transfig_3.2.5.e-5_SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.diff

[Reproducible-builds] LaTeX's \today

2016-04-04 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
need the same result for lualatex and xelatex, as shown in the attached test. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20160328/005135.html diff -Nru texlive-bin-2015.20160222.37495/debian/patches/honour-source-date-epoch-today

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820016: gabedit: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-04-04 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch sorts object files while building the final gabedit executable, to get a fixed order. Once applied, gabedit can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820032: bibledit-gtk: please make the build reproducible (environment)

2016-04-04 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'bibledit-gtk' could not be built reproducibly. That comes from the inclusion of the Makefile's used for building into the package. These files seem however not necessary: please consider removing them from bibledit-gtk-data, for example with the attached patch. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#822948: shotwell: please make the build reproducible (timestamps, umask)

2016-04-29 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'shotwell' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes date handling (tar needs an English date in --mtime) and fixes files mode in the temp-source archive. Once applied, shotwell can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#822963: htop: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-04-29 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'htop' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch honours the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable [2] to get a reproducible copyright year. Once applied, htop can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#822197: sphinx: please remove memory addresses from generated python documentation

2016-04-21 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
python-kombu-doc_3.0.35-1.1 : Transport.Connection.Channel.codecs = {'base64': } This memory address is irrelevant in the documentation, and prevents the package building to be reproducible. The attached patch strips these memory addresses, leading to better reproducibility. Regards, Alexis

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#822566: stk: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-04-25 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'stk' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the order in which *.o files are merged. Once applied, stk can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru stk-4.5.0/debian

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#822561: xpa: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-04-25 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'xpa' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the order in which *.o files are merged. Once applied, xpa can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru xpa-2.1.17/debian

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824808: gdal: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-19 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds Description: Sort files Sort files passed as arguments to make the build reproducible. Author: Alexis Bienvenüe <p...@passoire.fr> Index: gdal-2.1.0+dfsg/GNUmakefile === --

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#825092: grass: please make the build reproducible (fileordering, randomness)

2016-05-23 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ Description: Sort build modules list Sort modules in module_items.xml, to make the build reproducible. Author: Alexis Bienvenüe <p...@passoire.fr> --- grass

[Reproducible-builds] package uploaded to our repo

2016-05-19 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
texlive-bin_2016.20160513.41080-2.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824037: courier: please make the build reproducible (environment, timestamps)

2016-05-11 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2]: https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru courier-0.76.1/debian/changelog courier-0.76.1/debian/changelog --- courier-0.76.1/debian/changelog 2016-05-09 15

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824049: emacs24: please make start value of gensym-counter reproducible

2016-05-11 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
should be the same, but they differ (with different #:Gnnn values) Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ Description: Reproducible gensym-counter When calling batch-byte-compile, set the start value of gensym-counter from a hash of the command-line arguments

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824050: emacs24: please make autoloads files reproducible

2016-05-11 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
for this. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ [2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ Description: Make autoloads honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH Author: Alexis Bienvenüe <p...@passoire.fr> Index: emacs24-24.5+1/lisp/emacs-lisp/autol

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824569: gap-ctbllib: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-05-17 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'gap-ctbllib' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes timestamps from the compressed *.{six,toc} files. Once applied, gap-ctbllib can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824567: tkdesk: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-17 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'tkdesk' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the order in which files are parsed by the mkindex script. Once applied, tkdesk can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824592: twitter-bootstrap: wrong copyright formatting when using bash

2016-05-17 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
d, twitter-bootstrap can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/testing/amd64/twitter-bootstrap.html diff -Nru twitter-bootstrap-2.0.2+dfsg/debian/patches/06-

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824472: torch3: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-16 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the order in which *.o files are merged. Once applied, torch3 can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds --- Makefile.modules.orig

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824183: texlive-bin: please set default value of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES to 1

2016-05-13 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
used to build reproducible packages, and in this case the user always need SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES=1. Also, SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES=1 makes the dates in the timestamps and in the document coherent. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824653: elkcode: please make the build reproducible (environment)

2016-05-18 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'elkcode' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the locale used by ls to sort files. Once applied, elkcode can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds Description: Set ls

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824639: openblas: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-18 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'openblas' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the order files are passed to `ar' and gcc. Once applied, openblas can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds Description

[Reproducible-builds] SORCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES

2016-05-15 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
unlikely. Another solution is to drop SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES as if it is always set to 1, but I understand that it has to be kept if someone thinks it can be useful. Whatever will be your answer, I thank you again for your welcome regarding reproducibility questions. Regards, Alexis

Re: [Reproducible-builds] LaTeX's \today

2016-05-03 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Le 02/05/2016 10:56, Holger Levsen a écrit : >> I (very awkwardly) started something at >> https://www.tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2016-May/038339.html > > seems you got useful feedback there and your work was generally found > useful, yay! Please follow up on those suggestsions there! Here is

Re: [Reproducible-builds] LaTeX's \today

2016-05-04 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Hi. Here is the follow-up for the luatex side: https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/dev-luatex/2016-May/005700.html Please have a look at our discussion to correct me if I'm wrong and/or participate! Alexis. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

[Reproducible-builds] package uploaded to our repo

2016-05-06 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
texlive-bin_2015.20160222.37495-1.0~reproducible2.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#823241: unhide: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-02 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
that 'unhide' could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch fixes the order in which c files are passed to the compiler. Once applied, unhide can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru unhide

Re: [Reproducible-builds] LaTeX's \today

2016-05-02 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
here, it "just" needs doing, correct? I (very awkwardly) started something at https://www.tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2016-May/038339.html I can also prepare a new version from texlive-bin_2015.20160222.37495-1.0~reproducible1 if you think it should be relevant to test in the toolch

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#823393: kdbg: mixed encoding in changelog

2016-05-04 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
call used to process it uses binary mode, returning "Binary file matches" instead of the filtered content. Please find a patch that fixes those issues, allowing reproducible build [1,2]. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2] https://tests.re

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820932: fim: please make the build reproducible (fileordering, timestamps, locale)

2016-04-13 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
language to be English when using bison to make a grammar that is going to be parsed using English keywords. Once applied, fim can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff -Nru fim-0.5~rc2

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#823797: openclonk: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-05-09 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2]: https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru openclonk-7.0/debian/changelog openclonk-7.0/debian/changelog --- openclonk-7.0/debian/changelog 2016-02-14 12:26:56.0 +0100 +++ openclonk-7.0/debian

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#823824: asymptote: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-05-09 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds [2]: https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ diff -Nru asymptote-2.37.real/debian/changelog asymptote-2.37.real/debian/changelog --- asymptote-2.37.real/debian/changelog 2016-03-15 03:44:39.0

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-09 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
toolchain, that backports TL2016 patches to TL2015 currently packaged (without using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES), but it will be meaningful when TL2016 will be released and reach debian. Regards, Alexis Bienvenüe. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducib