> > BTW, no lists on l.d.o have a prefix,
>
> Yes, which is occassionally confusing, especially if mails go to
> multiple lists.
Well, luckily our fellow developers always write such good subject
lines that mean no additional context is ever needed... Right… ? ;-)
Regards,
--
,''`.
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > In case this was on purpose: Why? It's so helpful to quickly notice
> > which bug reports came in via (which) mailing list and which are ones
> > for packages I'm interested in.
>
> This thread happened:
> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:44:37PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> somewhen between 26th and 27th of August 2016, all bug reports
> X-Debbugs-Cc'ed to the reproducible-builds mailing list lack the
> "[Reproducible-builds]" tag in the subject line.
Yes.
> In case this was on purpose: Why? It's so hel
> In case this was on purpose: Why?
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20160822/006811.html
(I prefer the list without it)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Hi,
somewhen between 26th and 27th of August 2016, all bug reports
X-Debbugs-Cc'ed to the reproducible-builds mailing list lack the
"[Reproducible-builds]" tag in the subject line.
In case this was dropped accidentially: Please reenable it!
In case this was on purpose: Why? It's so helpful to qu
