Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#781517: tracker.d.o: please don't link ftbfs issues on reproducible.d.n

2015-04-29 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 29. April 2015, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > As dpkg-buildpackage now outputs `-Wdate-time` instead of > `-Werror=date-time` in the reproducible toolchain, I believe the above > to be less an issue. true, but I still think we shouldn't mark known false ftbfs as ftbfs... but: we know h

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#781517: tracker.d.o: please don't link ftbfs issues on reproducible.d.n

2015-04-29 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Holger Levsen: > On Montag, 30. März 2015, Paul Wise wrote: > > These seem like FTBFS that should be reported, so the package > > maintainers patch out usage of the macros, especially as the plan was > > to enable warnings for them by default eventually. > > yes, they should be reported. thats why

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#781517: tracker.d.o: please don't link ftbfs issues on reproducible.d.n

2015-03-30 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 30. März 2015, Paul Wise wrote: > These seem like FTBFS that should be reported, so the package > maintainers patch out usage of the macros, especially as the plan was > to enable warnings for them by default eventually. yes, they should be reported. thats why they are listed on h

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#781517: tracker.d.o: please don't link ftbfs issues on reproducible.d.n

2015-03-30 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > while you thankfully added links to unreproducible packages on > reproducible.debian.net you've also added links to packages which fail to > build from source there, as can for example be seen on > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ocaml-faad T