On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:03:24AM -0600, Tom Haynes wrote:
> Ceri Davies wrote:
>> Finally, is it expected that someone requesting a sponsor have a patch
>> that they consider final to be done, or is a WIP allowed?
>>
>> Ceri
>>
>
> It can be either. And it can also be the case that they have
Oh Yes Ceri. Wat you said is right :)
> These should arguably both be changed to something like
> "Permission denied" if they can be safely changed as neither
> "not super-user" nor "not owner" are necessarily going to be correct.
>
--
Regards
Ashwin
Hi all
My SCA # is OS0144
I would like to request a sponsor for Bug Id 4968927
the comment for EPERM error should match in the following two files
/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/sys/errno.h and
/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libc/port/gen/errlist
Changing both the comments for EPERM to "Not o
Questions and comments not necessarily targeted at Ashwin here:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:24:14PM +0530, ashwin wrote:
> Hi all
>
> My SCA # is OS0144
> I would like to request a sponsor for Bug Id 4968927
>
> the comment for EPERM error should match in the following two files
> /onnv/onnv-gat
Ceri Davies wrote:
> Finally, is it expected that someone requesting a sponsor have a patch
> that they consider final to be done, or is a WIP allowed?
>
> Ceri
>
It can be either. And it can also be the case that they haven't started
at all.
When you make a request for sponsor, it is effecti
