Scott Ferguson wrote:
On Jan 25, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Stargazer wrote:
Which would you use for best Quercus performance? If bugs are fixed in
Quercus, and applied to the 3.2.x line, are they to be fixed in future
3.1.x stable releases?
Ok so theres a dilemma here. We know 4.0 won't be stable until at least
the summer, but you don't advise anyone to use anything other than
stable in production environments. It seems a waste to see all these
Quercus fixes but never really be able to use them for 6 months.
Couldn't you consider one last stable 3.2.x release, with these latest
Quercus fixes, just for this reason?
For Quercus, you really need to use the latest version, because the
number of bug fixes and new functions is so large.
-- Scott
___
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
___
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.13/1914 - Release Date: 24/01/2009
20:40
___
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
