[Resteasy-users] Question about Accepts Header

2015-05-11 Thread Ramesh Reddy
Hi, In Teiid we have used RestEasy to implement the OData layer. We are seeing an issue with "Accepts" header. It is described here https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3471 see 2nd comment. Any pointers to resolve are appreciated. Thanks Ramesh.. ---

Re: [Resteasy-users] Basic authentication and @RolesAllowed on UndertowJaxrsServer

2015-05-11 Thread Ron Sigal
Hi Mark, I have a partial answer. That is, I can get Resteasy with Undertow to recognize @RolesAllowed, but I don't know much about security in Undertow. In the attached RollsAllowedTest, I have configured Undertow to impose identity constraints: @BeforeClass public static void init(

Re: [Resteasy-users] Client proxy issue deserializing Response.Status

2015-05-11 Thread Ron Sigal
Hi Guy, Maybe there's a problem with the media type produced by your resource method. The attached TestResponseStatus works for me. However, when I comment out the @Produces annotation: @Path("/") public static class TestResourceImpl { @POST @Path("post") // @Prod

[Resteasy-users] Fwd: Re: Question about Accepts Header

2015-05-11 Thread Ron Sigal
Meant to reply to list. Anyway, it looks like Resteasy 2.3.10.Final, more or less. -Ron Forwarded Message Subject:Re: [Resteasy-users] Question about Accepts Header Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 21:19:24 -0400 From: Ron Sigal To: Ramesh Reddy Hi Ramesh, Which v

[Resteasy-users] Fwd: Re: [Resteasy-developers] Maven build fails for 3.0.10.Final tag and master branch

2015-05-11 Thread Ron Sigal
I meant to reply to list. Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [Resteasy-developers] Maven build fails for 3.0.10.Final tag and master branch Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:04:04 -0400 From: Ron Sigal To: Konstantin Gribov Hi Konstantin, In your version of TestSecureProce

Re: [Resteasy-users] Client proxy issue deserializing Response.Status

2015-05-11 Thread Guy Rouillier
Ron, thanks for the reply. We figured out that having XML in the Produces clause appears to be causing this issue. Our plan is to remove that clause, and just allow JSON. When we do that, the method works without error. -- Guy Rouillier -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Sigal" To: