Re: cobalt

2000-03-07 Thread jakob krabbe
This is slightley OT but I'm not the one to judge. In respect to this list and if listmom want us to, we'll go private. --- You bet, I have an installed base numbering in the 40s. They work really well and even though there is no Retrospect Client (yet) I have been able to back them

Re: cobalt

2000-03-07 Thread Luke Jaeger
Marathon Computer, http://www.powerrack.com/ Harry Mueller wrote: There are a few companies that do conversions of desktop servers into rack mounted servers. I saw one that will convert an iMac into a 1u rackmountable case. I wish I could remember the name because I would think

Re: cobalt

2000-03-07 Thread Owen Watson
I asked our ISP about them, and he said he'd tested them and didn't do very well under load. I think he used a load of the thin Sun rackmounts in the end. Are there anyone out there using the cool Cobalt servers? I have looked into the NASRaQ, Network Area Storage, in a rack format, to use as

Re: cobalt

2000-03-07 Thread Harry Mueller
At 7:27 AM +1300 3/8/00, Owen Watson wrote: I asked our ISP about them, and he said he'd tested them and didn't do very well under load. I think he used a load of the thin Sun rackmounts in the end. Generally you are looking at configuration or network traffic problems when they