Re: (wrong version)

2000-12-21 Thread serge

Retrospect 4.3 on a 7300/200/G3 in syst 8.5
--

> 
> I saw this message once before and it was because I had put a tape that was
> written with 4.3 in a computer running 5.11.  A call to Dantz TS informed me
> that you CANNOT write on one platform and read in another (Mac and Windows).
> Which version are you running?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of serge
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 8:44 AM
> To: retro-talk
> Subject: (wrong version)
> 
> 
> We recently had a strange message while attempting to restore files that
> were on a DLT tape.
> Retrospect wanted a specific tape, and when we put this one into the DLT
> there was the icon of a normal DLT tape but retrospect was unable to
> identify the header (the name); in place of it we had "(wrong version)".
> A second tape from our alternate set of backup had the same problem.
> Our second DLT had no problem with this tape.
> Could it be due to the fact that those tapes were once used in a Unix-based
> backup system (but, obviously, erased)?
> 




--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:
Search:  

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



RE: (wrong version)

2000-12-18 Thread Mike L.

I saw this message once before and it was because I had put a tape that was
written with 4.3 in a computer running 5.11.  A call to Dantz TS informed me
that you CANNOT write on one platform and read in another (Mac and Windows).
Which version are you running?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of serge
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 8:44 AM
To: retro-talk
Subject: (wrong version)


We recently had a strange message while attempting to restore files that
were on a DLT tape.
Retrospect wanted a specific tape, and when we put this one into the DLT
there was the icon of a normal DLT tape but retrospect was unable to
identify the header (the name); in place of it we had "(wrong version)".
A second tape from our alternate set of backup had the same problem.
Our second DLT had no problem with this tape.
Could it be due to the fact that those tapes were once used in a Unix-based
backup system (but, obviously, erased)?

--
Serge Paulus
Helpdesk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microscript s.a.
51 rue du Poinçon
B-1000 Brussels
Belgium
tel: 32(0)2/213.00.96
fax: 32(0)2/502.56.32
"Confusion will be my epitaph"




--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.