Thanks Christian,
I've deinstalled Python 3.1 and installed Python 2.6.
It's now working :-)
So now I can start experimenting with svn hooks.
Markus
On Jun 10, 7:51 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Markus,
Python 3.x is very different from 2.x. We don't support it yet (nor
If You look for SVN hooks I attach example in
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=445
This hook check status of Roundup Issue tracker ticket. If ok they
made review or commit code if review was made and diffs are identical.
On Jun 11, 11:15 am, LeChuck m...@silverseed.de wrote:
Awesome, thanks Jan!
Unfortunately I’ve no background in Python, so if you don’t mind, let me
know how do I apply those patches.
Thanks again!
Martelo
2010/6/10 Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com
Hi!
I made some patches to ClearCase. Please look at patches
I notice that the status is listed as PendingReview - has this fix
ever been applied to the reviewboard trunk?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=394
I ask only because I am having the same exact issue as outlined in the
bug report.
Thanks
Matt
--
Want to help the Review
Read this. All what You need is download raw diff and use patch
On Jun 11, 2:05 pm, Cássio Fernando Berra martel...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome, thanks Jan!
Unfortunately I’ve no background in Python, so if you don’t mind, let me
know how do I apply those patches.
Thanks again!
Martelo
On 06/10/2010 03:24 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
We're running on MySQL. I don't know why you'd be seeing such a huge
delay with PostgreSQL though. Can you tell me which pages are showing
delays? (Is it all of them?)
if it's the dashboard, there are some known slowdowns when
Comment #4 on issue 1615 by chris0123456789: Removing a file after it has
been svn added causes post-review to not work
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1615
Yes:
diff (GNU diffutils) 2.8.1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Spam
Comment #1 on issue 1681 by chipx86: asdfsaf
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1681
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to
Comment #13 on issue 394 by chipx86: if a diff includes a file that has
been cvs remove'd, reviewboard won't accept it
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=394
It does look like the fix exists in the codebase, both on master and 1.0.x.
--
You received this message because
Comment #1 on issue 1655 by dgibson66: Reply to the previous comment
button in diff view just takes you to review view
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1655
The right action here, in my opinion, would be to open a reply text box
without changing pages.
--
You
Comment #2 on issue 1655 by chipx86: Reply to the previous comment button
in diff view just takes you to review view
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1655
Yes, but we need to figure out the interaction there, because in order for
the comment to be public, you have to
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release1.5 Milestone-Release1.6
Comment #7 on issue 1633 by trowbrds: Repository configuration should not
expose passwords
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1633
Looks like there's not a good, easy solution to this that works
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1682 by bburtin: post-review mangles the Perforce server name
when the IP is in /etc/hosts
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1682
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What
Comment #1 on issue 1682 by bburtin: post-review mangles the Perforce
server name when the IP is in /etc/hosts
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1682
The problem is probably somewhere around here in PerforceClient:
hostname, port = repository_path.split(:)
14 matches
Mail list logo