Re: Git style mercurial diffs with file renames don't work

Hi Sara, Definitely looks like a bug in how we're representing the revisions. Would you be able to file a bug and provide a full diff (of a trivial file or something) that we can use to reproduce the problem? Thanks, Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board -

Re: Git style mercurial diffs with file renames don't work

Done. Note that I was unable to attach the diffs to the bug as Issue attachment quota exceeded but they are very short, and I included the contents. https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3573thanks=3573ts=1411132852 Thanks. Sara On Friday, September 19, 2014 1:10:12 AM

GIT Post Commit / older Commits / Pure Code - Reviews initiated from the Website (or rbt)?

Hi there, I saw screenshots where the repository branches show up in the lower half of the New Review Request section. This was also mentioned in the documentation. Currently we are running version 2.0.7 of Review Board and have two repositories which are hosted on the same server. They are

Re: GIT Post Commit / older Commits / Pure Code - Reviews initiated from the Website (or rbt)?

The post-commit UI is currently only available for GitHub and SVN repositories. Support for more types of repositories will come in future versions. Which repository type are you using? -David On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Hans Raaf oder...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I saw screenshots

Re: Git style mercurial diffs with file renames don't work

Yeah... we're having a lot of trouble getting Google to bump up our very limited attachment quota. We might be switching bug trackers in the future. Thanks for the bug! Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. -

Dockerized reviewboard

Hi, I created the docker version of reviewboard, which is more configurable than the ones I found on the docker hub. If anyone is interested, welcome! https://github.com/ikatson/docker-reviewboard Thanks! -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up

Re: Dockerized reviewboard

Very cool! Would you be interested in adding this to the RB Package Store at https://www.reviewboard.org/store/ ? We're hoping to build that out as a common place to find first- and third-party integrations and extensions for Review Board, and this would be an interesting addition. Christian

Re: Dockerized reviewboard

No problem, added here https://www.reviewboard.org/store/products/7/, waiting moderation. On Friday, September 19, 2014 2:21:34 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Very cool! Would you be interested in adding this to the RB Package Store at https://www.reviewboard.org/store/ ? We're hoping

Re: Reg :RBT POST

Hi David Thanks the problem was in the repo name . I didnt use the root path in svn info Thanks Arjun On Wednesday, 17 September 2014 12:05:50 UTC-7, Arjun A.M. wrote: Hello I have got my reviewboard working but I am facing problems with rbt post. If I do a rbt diff I get the correct

Issue 3573 in reviewboard: Git style mercurial diffs with file renames don't work

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3573 by sararayb...@gmail.com: Git style mercurial diffs with file renames don't work https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3573 What version are you running? RB 2.0.7 What's the URL of the page

Issue 3574 in reviewboard: Add support in post-review for p4 imported files (integration from remote depot)

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3574 by jan_sjo...@yahoo.com: Add support in post-review for p4 imported files (integration from remote depot) https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3574 *** For customer support, please post to

Issue 3575 in reviewboard: Tabs are not displayed correctly

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3575 by danie...@gmail.com: Tabs are not displayed correctly https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3575 What version are you running? 1.6.9 What's the URL of the page containing the problem?

Re: Issue 3575 in reviewboard: Tabs are not displayed correctly

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 3575 by trowb...@gmail.com: Tabs are not displayed correctly https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3575 We can't look at your internal review board server, but I will say that 1.6.9 is *very* old, and that 2.0.x especially

Re: Issue 3108 in reviewboard: APIErrors return 403 but do not log anything

Comment #4 on issue 3108 by justy...@gmail.com: APIErrors return 403 but do not log anything https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3108 Looking into this for an Easy Bug fix. --- Justin Maillet -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all

Re: Issue 3478 in reviewboard: Allow disabling Markdown through an option/checkbox

Comment #4 on issue 3478 by alexey.n...@gmail.com: Allow disabling Markdown through an option/checkbox https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3478 Please make a setting to disable markdown. The ``` workaround doesn't work very well as RB then attempts to perform the syntax

Issue 3576 in reviewboard: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3576 by vlov...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report

Re: Issue 3576 in reviewboard: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 3576 by chip...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576 That stacktrace shows that you're still running Review Board 1.7.20, but now with a 2.0.7 database. You'll need

Re: Issue 3576 in reviewboard: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed

Comment #3 on issue 3576 by vlov...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576 ls /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard- ReviewBoard-1.7.20-py2.6.egg/ ReviewBoard-2.0.7-py2.6.egg/ -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 3576 in reviewboard: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed

Comment #4 on issue 3576 by vlov...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576 Hmm... I've uninstall reviewboard dependencies from scratch installed it again. I've restarted the web server memchached. Yet the stack trace

Re: Issue 3576 in reviewboard: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed

Comment #5 on issue 3576 by chip...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576 Are you using Apache, or just nginx? -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this

Re: Issue 3576 in reviewboard: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed

Comment #6 on issue 3576 by vlov...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576 I think I found it. I'm using just nginx uwsgi is still running. Can't figure out who owns that process, but I'll figure it out. Thanks. Any

Re: Issue 3576 in reviewboard: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed

Comment #7 on issue 3576 by chip...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576 easy_install doesn't actually remove old versions of packages, since generally-speaking, Python modules of different versions can be co-installed

Issue 3577 in reviewboard: Provide review as separate tar ball

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3577 by niranjja...@gmail.com: Provide review as separate tar ball https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3577 Hi, Installing Review Board separately on a server behind firewall and no access for internet