--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4699/
--
New update by alexG
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4699
Reply:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4804/
--
New ticket #4804 by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools
Status: New
Tags:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4750/
--
New update by totoroliu
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4750
Hi,
I noticed when I upgraded Subversion to 1.10, Reviewboard stopped
displaying binary files on Diff GUI.
Index: /abc/branches/3.x/3.0/trunk/cooked/basepkgs/abc.pkg
===
Cannot display: file marked as a binary
the settings on the group? Is it an invite-only group?
>
> Can you re-run the query and then check reviewboard.log on the server for
> access warnings?
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 10:47 AM Kevin Yu >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm having iss
Hi,
I'm having issues using the review_group_users api. When I called the api
as admin users, I'm getting http 403 (permission denied) back.
This is the api I'm referring
to
need to see any of the expanded "Local vars" (at least not yet), but
> need to see every line of code being shown in the trace.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christian
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Yu <sams...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> &
7, Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Sessions default to lasting 1 year. You can customize this by adding the
> SESSION_COOKIE_AGE setting to your $sitedir/conf/settings_local.py file,
> like:
>
>
> SESSION_COOKIE_AGE = 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 # 1 year
>
>
> Chri
I have a question about Reviewboard login session. I've noticed i never
have to login again after inactive for a long period of time. Just
wondering how long would the session expire, if at all?
Is there a setting to set this?
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4577/
--
New update by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4577
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4577/
--
New update by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4577
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4577/
--
New ticket #4577 by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
We recently performed the same operation. We also backup the site folder
under /var/www and /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 8:34:20 PM UTC-7, harish varadarajan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We intend to upgrade to RB 2.5.13.1 (from 2.5.6.1) and below is the list
> of
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4450/
--
New update by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4450
;
>>>>>>>>> I've put some print in packaging.py to help debugging. Here's what
>>>>>>>>> I have changed:
>>>>>>>>> def install_pipeline_deps(self, extension, css_bundles,
>>>>>>>>> js_
hon? I'm curious as to whether
> pipeline_settings.LESS_BINARY in install_pipeline_deps() is being correctly
> set.
>
> Christian
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Kevin Yu <sams...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
>> Looks like the path to the npm_modules are prepopulated based on the
>> f
',
'djblets.pipeline.compilers.less.LessCompiler',
]
NODE_PATH = os.path.join(REVIEWBOARD_ROOT, '..', 'node_modules')
On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 5:44:51 PM UTC-7, Kevin Yu wrote:
>
> Thanks Christian for the quick reply! much appreciated.
>
> It was installed using easy_install under Ubuntu.
>
> On Friday, June 9,
ode.js installed
and then run:*
$ sudo npm install -g less uglifyjs
I am wondering if this is related...
On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 4:41:10 PM UTC-7, Kevin Yu wrote:
>
> On our server, we had reviewboard core 2.5.6.1 running with our own
> extension. it was all fine until we re
On our server, we had reviewboard core 2.5.6.1 running with our own
extension. it was all fine until we recently upgraded reviewboard core to
2.5.12. After the upgrade, we can't run python setup.py -v build anymore...
The error is as follows:
devops@Reviewboard-Test-trunk:/tmp/ReviewBoardExt$
Hi All,
I'm using an admin user to create the RBClient and I'm trying to post a
review with ship_it=True as user 'team_waive'. However, it's still posting
as the admin user.
Here's my code:
def create_review(self, request, comment='', ship_it=False, \
public=True,
Just to provide an update, it works! Thanks a lot
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 5:50:54 PM UTC-7, Kevin Yu wrote:
>
> Thanks David! I will give it a try!
>
> On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 4:25:03 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>> Kevin,
>>
>> The c
o-custom-models
> for
> instructions on how to do this and where to put the file.
>
> -David
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:08 PM Kevin Yu <sams...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Recently we updated our database schema to add another field to a tabl
Hi All,
Recently we updated our database schema to add another field to a table
that's used by our own reviewboard extension. When we run python setup.py
install to install the extension, we run into the following error:
stdout: Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4545/
--
New ticket #4545 by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
Hi,
I'm wondering there is any way to update the notification subject before
sending out email. We would like add some information to the notification
email subject, which is currently using the review request's summary.
I've created https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4544/ as feature
Just looked at your question again. If you are posting review request
through GUI, I assume our issue is different.
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 4:30:12 PM UTC-7, Kevin Yu wrote:
>
> We had run into the same issue a few times. What happened is that I use
> user A for Reviewboard Serve
We had run into the same issue a few times. What happened is that I use
user A for Reviewboard Server A and B user for reviewboard Server B. Even
after rbt logout, when i run rbt post to reviewboard B, it's posted as User
A.
rm -Rf ~/.rbtools-cookies fixed the issue for me.
On Monday, March
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4544/
--
New ticket #4544 by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Kevin Yu <sams...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I just did a quick simple test, I svn rm and svn add some files and then
>
. In this case, the api doesn't return the file id.
Please see the screenshot below.
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Fk8E5uZFIKE/WNBRPscrr6I/ClQ/RhXQJbrtj34HVQvICDAE1Ki3MAnL7g39QCLcB/s1600/Selection_001.bmp>
On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 2:33:02 PM UTC-7, Kevin Yu wrote:
>
> My Workf
. The API is also not doing any
> filtering that I can see.
>
> What version of Review Board and RBTools are you using?
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 15:54 Kevin Yu <sams...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Thanks for your
f this size, and maybe there's some good optimizations
> we can do that would help everyone. 750MB is definitely a corner case,
> though. Still, I want to track this, see if it leads to possible
> shortcuts/improvements in our algorithm.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Fri, Mar
I recently run in this issue. Basically I had to svn rm an older kernel
folder which is about 750MB. I did a rbt diff but it's not return after 5
hours and counting.
I understand it's not normal practice to delete a huge folder and post to
reviewboard. However, is this performance expected?
; the diff viewer itself?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Kevin Yu <sams...@gmail.com
> > w
I'm using SVN btw.
On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 2:33:02 PM UTC-7, Kevin Yu wrote:
>
> My Workflow when rbt patch fail because of file conflicts:
> Get Review Request by ID -> review_request.get_diffs() and from the
> return, i get the file id by matching the filename. With
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4527/
--
New ticket #4527 by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools
Status: New
Tags:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4409/
--
New update by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #4409
Reply:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4488/
--
New ticket #4488 by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4409/
--
New update by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #4409
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4409/
--
New update by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #4409
Reply:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4450/
--
New update by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4450
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4450/
--
New ticket #4450 by samsun387
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
42 matches
Mail list logo
