Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The configuration looks fine. Can you provide RBTools debug log (--debug)?
>
> Was Apache also listening on port 8090, and without SSL? I'm curious if
> RBTools is using the correct address.
>
> Christian
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:19 AM tw bert wr
Hi,
RB 4.0.1, RbTools 2.0
To tune some RAM issues, we switched to nginx+gunicorn (like in the docker
images).
The RB site works fine.
Even dl-ing something from the api via the browser works fine:
http://srv-reviewboard:8090/api/users/
gives a downloaded file with the users
However, using
We use hgweb, but see
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/3.0/admin/configuration/repositories/mercurial/#adding-the-repository
for other options.
On Friday, 28 May 2021 at 15:48:03 UTC+2 jeganc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have installed Review Board on Server A
>
> I have a
read when it's out.
>
> Christian
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 1:54 PM tw bert wrote:
>
>>
>> When rebuilding Whoosh indexes, we get:
>>
>> root@srv-flux-dev-01:/# sudo -u www-data rb-site manage /var/www/
>> FOO.BAR.com rebuild_index
&
When rebuilding Whoosh indexes, we get:
root@srv-flux-dev-01:/# sudo -u www-data rb-site manage
/var/www/FOO.BAR.com rebuild_index
ERROR:djblets.extensions.manager:Error initializing extension
rbcommenttype.extension.CommentTypeExtension: Error setting up
administration URLs: Error while
call look like? Any changes showing up in extra_data?
>
> Christian
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 4:08 AM tw bert wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian, congrats on the RB4 release!
>>
>> We don't have a RB extension, we only want to store some custom data in
>> extra_data.
>>
&
request directly without a
> draft.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 05:54 tw bert wrote:
>
>> When doing the following change:
>>
>> draft = revreq.get_or_create_draft()
>> revreq.update(**{'extra_data:json' :
>> json.dumps({'my_dummy_ext
When doing the following change:
draft = revreq.get_or_create_draft()
revreq.update(**{'extra_data:json' :
json.dumps({'my_dummy_extra_data':'Hello World'
},indent=2,ensure_ascii=False)})
draft.update(public=True)
We get the following response:
rbtools.api.errors.BadRequestError: You
> that’ll help us track it as a possibility in the future, if we see enough
> demand for it.
>
> In more positive news, we’ll be supporting custom URL protocols in 3.0.24
> (probably in a month).
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 02:17 tw bert wrote
/were-switching-to-commonmark
Kind regards, TW
On Saturday, 8 May 2021 at 09:47:06 UTC+2 tw bert wrote:
> A setting for allowed protocols would be great.
> We run RB on our LAN only, so even a simple environment variable would
> suffice.
> For our use case, it does not need to be
d to look into
> the options here.
>
> To check, does your company have a support contract with us? If so, we
> could expedite a pre-release build once we have something in place.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 04:19 tw bert wrote:
>
>> Hi, unfo
Hi, unfortunately we need to downgrade back to 3.0.20, because we use
custom protocols in our markdown descriptions. Example:
_Eclipse Hyperlinks:_
[my\_short\_demo.txt](eclipse:///openfile?workspace=TryoutEclipse=default=1=0=0=mercurial_xtryout=xtryout/my_short_demo.txt)
Renders to clickable
ian Hammond
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looks like something went wrong with the release. You can get around this
>> temporarily by doing:
>>
>> pip install bleach_allowlist
>>
>> We'll put out a fixed build tonight.
>>
>> Christian
RB breaks when upgrading, we reverted to backup.
Any clue? Previous upgrades always went fine.
pip install -U ReviewBoard==3.0.22
(ok)
root@srv-flux-dev-01:/# rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviews.XXX.XXX.com
WARNING:py.warnings:/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paramiko/transport.py:33:
14 matches
Mail list logo
