extra machinations.
Walt
From: Igor Berger [mailto:codewiz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 2:10 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Cc: Javins, Walt
Subject: Re: Required vs Optional Reviewers
Our convention when sending out a review is: add required individuals reviewers
Also, on review notification emails, people get email to them and the group
gets CCed. Which fits what the OP asked for.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us
that applies our
policy in order to close reviews.
Hope that helps.
Mark
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:31:01 PM UTC-8, Javins, Walt wrote:
Has there been any discussion around ‘required’ vs ‘optional’ reviewers
on a rrq?
Prior to Review Board, we would use email for CR, and could specify
, February 4, 2014 3:31:01 PM UTC-5, Javins, Walt wrote:
Has there been any discussion around ‘required’ vs ‘optional’ reviewers
on a rrq?
Prior to Review Board, we would use email for CR, and could specify the
‘To:’ vs ‘Cc:’ headers to communicate the importance that a particular
