Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-25 Thread Phil Hom
We upgraded from 1.6.3 to 1.6.10, everything looks good. Except the Authentication Settings page only shows Standard Reg and Legacy, no LDAP, AD, or others. Is there something I'm misssing. THanks. Phil On Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:20:30 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, We

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-25 Thread Christian Hammond
Did you upgrade using pip or easy_install? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Phil Hom phil...@gmail.com wrote: We upgraded from 1.6.3 to 1.6.10, everything

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-25 Thread Phil Hom
We grabed the gzips from the releases directory and created RPMs for DJblets 0.6.21 and reviewboard 1.6.10, then installed the RPMs, then ran rb-site upgrade. We used RPMs before for 1.6.3, so continued doing it this way just in case we need to back out. On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:05:27 PM

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-25 Thread Christian Hammond
We make use of setuptools-provided Python Entrypoints, which register some scannable bits of data for things like authentication modules. It sounds like those registrations got lost somehow in your packaging. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-25 Thread Phil Hom
The problem turned out to be the RPM spec file for reviewboard listed Djblets 0.6.20, while we upgraded to 0.6.21. There were auth module errors in the reviewboard log. This has been fixed by re-rolling the reviewboard RPM. Thanks for your help. Phil On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:00:36 PM

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-24 Thread Christian Hammond
Are you able to edit existing non-drafts? Christian On Jul 24, 2012, at 3:44, Alex Postlethwaite alexpostlethwa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same problem. On the outgoing requests page, the new review is tagged with [Draft]. There we no javascript errors during page load (using

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-24 Thread Christian Hammond
Also, can you e-mail me a screenshot? In private is fine. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.comwrote: Are you able to edit

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-24 Thread Alex Postlethwaite
Thanks. I'll try the update when I'm back at work. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-23 Thread whatever
So I upgraded from 1.6.9 yesterday, but rbssh.py was having issues. It couldn't get past the following import: from reviewboard.scmtools import sshutils I didn't have time to figure out the problem as I needed to get it back up last night, so I went back to 1.6.9. I should be able to try

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-23 Thread Christian Hammond
By the way, if there are people who upgraded to this release and aren't experiencing errors, that'd be a great datapoint to have. Christian On Jul 23, 2012, at 11:48, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.com wrote: I'd be interested in knowing if there were any JavaScript errors. Did you do

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-23 Thread whatever
I'll update when I get another chance to try later this week. I'm sure it's something simple. On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:10:18 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote: This doesn't sound like something in the code, but rather a setup issue on your server. If that import fails, my guess is that