Re: Not able to authenticate against AD
Tried all possible configs. install / re-install all components including RB, python-ldap, etc. But no Luck. Is there any plain config settings file which can be hand-edited? Shann On Jan 22, 7:30 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi, It sounds like it's failing to see the servers. It's possible that this is another manifestation of the stale settings bug. Can you try restarting Apache and seeing if it works? You may also hit this if the domain controller specified isn't actually an LDAP/Active Directory server. Of course, something may be busted with python-ldap head, too. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Shann mas...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have installed ReviewBoard-1.1alpha3.dev_20100121-py2.4 on CentOS 5.4 x86_64 server. I have also installed mysql-python, python-ldap (latest head revision from its repo), pydns. My Configuration is Admin/Settings/Authentification is Auth_Method = Active Directiry domain name = mobiapps.com The auth fails with 2010-01-21 17:58:21,079 - ERROR - Active Directory error: Could not contact any domain controller servers I have tried with TLS ON/OFF, Find DC from from DNS ON/OFF and specifying the OU Name, but all these config settings fail with the above error Please help me -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Question on code review for files after they've been modified by another persons checkin
I've recently set up ReviewBoard with Perforce configured for pre- commits. Perforce allows source files to be checked out by multiple developers at the same time. If one developer submits a file for review and then a second developer checks in their changes to the same file before the code reviewer has had a chance to look at the first developers changes, the diff will be out of date. The diff stored in ReviewBoard uses the rev of the source code in Perforce at the time the review was submitted. Is there any workaround for this situation? Is there any way for ReviewBoard to at least flag the reviewer that they're not reviewing the latest revision of the source code from source control. Or maybe have ReviewBoard notify the developer that they need to resolve changes and re-submit the file for review? Thanks, Glen -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Question on code review for files after they've been modified by another persons checkin
seacgmk wrote: I've recently set up ReviewBoard with Perforce configured for pre- commits. Perforce allows source files to be checked out by multiple developers at the same time. If one developer submits a file for review and then a second developer checks in their changes to the same file before the code reviewer has had a chance to look at the first developers changes, the diff will be out of date. The diff stored in ReviewBoard uses the rev of the source code in Perforce at the time the review was submitted. Is there any workaround for this situation? Is there any way for ReviewBoard to at least flag the reviewer that they're not reviewing the latest revision of the source code from source control. Or maybe have ReviewBoard notify the developer that they need to resolve changes and re-submit the file for review? Not at the moment. If it were me I would add this to postreview rather than Reviewboard. I've not used p4 but I've used p2; p2 has a need command to check for new files, I suspect it would probably be fairly easy to do and quick. Having Reviewboard check that the version being reviewed is the latest is certainly something that would be nice to have but it would need to be generic and would probably need a lot of thought to cover all the different SCMs (it may be more appropriate do this via the plug-in architecture that Christian has mentioned will be available for later releases of RB). Chris -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
