I'm evaluating review-board (1.6 beta1) with our corporate git setup,
sadly when I try to use post-review it spits out the following
(repository path anonymized):
$ post-review -d --parent=HEAD~1 HEAD
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = /home/madcoder
svn info
git rev-parse --git-dir
git symbolic-ref -q
I have some problem about sight issues.
For example,
A user create new Review Request(RQ) and he set this RQ's review group
as A1'
Now, I want that review group A1 only access A's RQ.
My problem is that, anyone who log on my reviewboard can access and
review A's RQ.
I cannot control them
This is not possible in the released version. However, this functionality is
available in the upcoming 1.6 release. There is an alpha out right now,
which I don't recommend for production use yet, but it supports this. We
hopefully will have a final release in a couple of months. For now, you'd
Thank you for your help,
Because my company have strict rule about managing source code,
So, we cannot using Reviewboard right now...
Have a good day :)
On 4월6일, 오후5시14분, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
This is not possible in the released version. However, this functionality is
How have you been? I saw this Acai Berry stuff that is actually
unbelievable! I have been feeling fantastic since i've been taking it.
finally found a way to lose weight that works and is actually healthy
for you! check out this article about it if you want to read more
about it and buy some
Sorry to hear that, but I completely understand. I hope you'll check back
when 1.6 is out the door and see if it meets your needs then :)
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
2011/4/6
Well,
My language, Korean, isn't parsing in Reviewboard.
For example,
I submit Change List(CL) in perforce, and CL's description field is
filled with 'Korean', not English.
And, I go to my Reviewboard server.
In Main menu,
Select New Review Request and select repository (perforce port)
Does anyone read these??? I would think this is a pretty simple
question to answer.
On Apr 4, 3:14 pm, funeeldy funee...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am trying to get an answer to this question. Does reviewboard work
with git submodules?
Thanks.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
maybe you seems to using euc-kr in your perforce
2011. 4. 6. 오후 9:36에 Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com님이 작성:
This looks VERY similar in behavior (but different manifestation) to the
UnicodeDecode error that another Windows user saw recently with UTF8 encoded
files (check the archive for
Hi, everyone.
I had installed ReviewBoard and I created a review uploading the diff patch
from the web UI. This task worked perfectly, but when I want use post-review
for the same , I get the following error:
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']
I have configured mi
Hi, everyone.
I had installed ReviewBoard and I created a review uploading the diff
patch from the web UI. This task worked perfectly, but when I want use
post-review for the same , I get the following error:
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']
I have configured mi
Martin wrote:
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']
What happens when you manually run:
git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
Nothing happens.
The command is executed but I don't get anything by the standar output.
Any else tip will be useful.
Thanks a lot.
MArtin.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
Before anything...
I configured my non-bare git repository in ReviewBoard. This repository is a
git svn clone of a central SVN repository.
I'm trying to execute a pre commit review, using the post-review commit with
the following syntax:
cat file.diff |post-review -d --diff-filename=-
Is this
Hi,
Sorry, I'm usually faster to respond but I'm on vacation this week and
not checking mail often.
We do not work with git submodules. Review Board associates one review
request per repository and wouldn't know where or how to access the
submodule files.
Christian
On Wednesday, April 6,
Can you paste a full debug log (pass --debug to post-review)?
Also, run that command again and do: echo $?
That will show the error code returned by git. Non-0 is failure.
Christian
On Wednesday, April 6, 2011, Martin martin.villalo...@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing happens.
The command is
I'm getting an error when using the latest version of postreview to
post an IP from and SVN client:
$ post-review --server=http://reviewboard.ingres.prv --bug=1810 --
summary=X-IP for Mantis 1810 - test
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/post-review, line 9, in module
The full debug log below
-bash-4.0$ cat AirStories.diff |post-review --debug --diff-filename=-
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = /home/hudsonhome
svn info
git rev-parse --git-dir
git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']
-bash-4.0$ echo $?
1
-bash-4.0$
I
Our repository is perforce, their P4CHARATERSET=none.
Our Reviewboard's database support Unicode(utf-8).
And our reviewboard repository setting, Advanced - Encoding box is
empty.
Please check that...
Thank you.
On 4월7일, 오전2시24분, Min-Woo Lee mw44@gmail.com wrote:
maybe you seems to using
I figured it out!
So I had mod-python installed, but that needed openLDAP.
I install openLDAP, but that needed (openSSL or gnuTLS) and Cyrus
SASL.
So basically I installed openSSL and SASL, then re-installed openLDAP
and mod-python.
On Apr 4, 8:16 pm, Turbo ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Our Perforce server is window 2003 server
server manager said, he didn't set charset anything.
So, maybe perforce server's encoding is euc-kr..
How my ReviewBoard settings change to euc-kr??
Please anyone response to me...
Thank you.
On 4월7일, 오전10시48분, jh5774@samsung.com
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 2059 by jianjun@gmail.com: Enhancement of expanding hidden
lines
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2059
*NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/
What
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2060 by alexande...@gmail.com: Not possible to send 2nd revision
for a code review
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2060
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2062 by the...@gmail.com: Clicking on links changes to edit mode
instead of opening the link in the browser
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2062
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this
Comment #12 on issue 342 by trowb...@gmail.com: Allow incremental expansion
of collapsed code blocks
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=342
Issue 2059 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #9 on issue 1893 by trowb...@gmail.com: Fields shouldn't become
editable when selecting text or clicking hyperlinks
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1893
Issue 2062 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1893
Comment #1 on issue 2062 by trowb...@gmail.com: Clicking on links changes
to edit mode instead of opening the link in the browser
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2062
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates:
Summary: Fields shouldn't become editable when selecting text or clicking
hyperlinks
Comment #8 on issue 1893 by trowb...@gmail.com: Fields shouldn't become
editable when selecting text or clicking hyperlinks
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1893
(No comment
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 2061 by trowb...@gmail.com: can not view diff and
post-review
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2061
How was this review request created? It sounds like a patch was updated
that wasn't based off of the code in your
29 matches
Mail list logo
