Permissions on requests draft
Hello, First of all, thanks for ReviewBoard we are using it for reviewing Tuleap development since a couple of weeks and it's really helpful! We are trying to do this (based on RB 1.6): - Our model is: post-reviews on development branches before merge into trunk (subversion) - A group of fellow contributors are able to create new review requests - They are doing a first round of review internally and when they are proud of their code, they ask for review to core developers. So we created 2 review groups (tuleap-contrib and tuleap-core). - But when one -contrib member created a review for a given branch, others cannot update the review. - Typical scenario: * Developer A submit a first review request * Integrator K make some comments * Developer B does some fix, update the diff, answers comments but is not allowed tu publish this draft. He has to wait for Developer A to update the diff. I don't know if it's clear enough. Is there any way to get all the members of one group to update the reviews of its siblings ? Thanks, Manuel -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Issues with RBTools and Subversion
svn 1.7's diff returns some extra entries for added binary files (the
prop-add).
We've been getting around this by parsing the diff, keeping track of
any files marked as a binary type, and deleting any subsequent Index:
FILE entries where FILE is one of those binary files. So for example,
changing your diff to just the entry below should make it work...
Index: run/assets/x
===
Cannot display: file marked as a binary type.
svn:mime-type = application/octet-stream
Charlie
On Nov 18, 12:48 pm, Jeff Ward j...@fuzzybinary.com wrote:
Hey All,
I'm having some problems with Subversion 1.7 and RBTools. It looks
like Subversion 1.7 (at least SilkSvn) broke using Windows GNU Diff,
using --diff-cmd as all attempts to get the diff error out with:
===
svn: E200012: 'diff' returned 2
svn: E175002: Error reading spooled REPORT request response
This is probably a bug in subversion 1.7, but I can't get around it
(unless someone knows a good way to do this?)
So I wrote a script to take care of some of this by manually
generating the diff from svn and handing that to RBTools directly.
Now however, I'm getting a different issue. When we added a new
binary file, SVN's diff says:
Index: run/assets/x
===
Cannot display: file marked as a binary type.
svn:mime-type = application/octet-stream
Index: run/assets/x
===
--- run/assets/x (revision 184)
+++ run/assets/x (revision 185)
Apparently when this gets sent to Review board, it makes it unhappy
and reports this:
Got API Error 207 (HTTP code 400): The file was not found in the
repository
Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'file': u'/run/assets/x', u'err':
{u'msg': u'The file was not found in the repository', u'code': 207},
u'revision': u'184'}
Is there a way around this? Should Review board understand that
revision --- for revision 184 means it *shouldn't* exist?
--
Jeff
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Issue 2422 in reviewboard: Sending mail failure
Comment #2 on issue 2422 by w.sitni...@gmail.com: Sending mail failure http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2422 I use damn gmail SMTP Settings were server: smtp.gmail.com port: 465 TSL enabled after searching solution on google via 'reviewboard gmail smtp' I found this link http://www.mail-archive.com/reviewboard@googlegroups.com/msg02778.html which says that 465 port is bad , 587 is good. I tried and I got it working. Thank you very much, close this please -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2020 in reviewboard: User account page should list fish trophies acquired by the user.
Comment #1 on issue 2020 by nickthec...@gmail.com: User account page should list fish trophies acquired by the user. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2020 I agree. One should be able to lord one's trophies over one's colleagues. Otherwise, what's the point? :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2402 in reviewboard: RBTools 0.3.4 breaks HTTP authentication on Review Board 1.0
Comment #1 on issue 2402 by mkot...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.3.4 breaks HTTP authentication on Review Board 1.0 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2402 I also experience the same issue on Linux RedHat 2.6 i686. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
