Configurable review 'information' location - move it back to the top of the page

2014-06-22 Thread Justin Fletcher
Hiya, I am evaluating upgrading to Reviewboard 2.0.2 and one thing the jumped out at me as a bad decision was the move of the 'information' section from the top of the page on reviews, to the right hand side. The reasons I feel it to be a bad decision is that: * the content of this

Re: Configurable review 'information' location - move it back to the top of the page

2014-06-22 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Justin, There is no configurable option for this, and there’s unlikely to be one. I knew going into this that this wouldn’t be a popular change for everybody involved, but I believe it was the right one to make. I’ll go into our reasons why: 1. Most review request texts are either

Re: Bitnami Reviewboard 2.0.2 doesn't show properly java and properties files

2014-06-22 Thread Christian Hammond
It’s dependent on the browser and server configuration. I have a fix going into 2.0.3 that will force guessing the mimetype if ‘application/octet-stream’ is provided by the client. Christian --  Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag,

Re: Issue 2269 in reviewboard: Allow inline review for non-text file types

2014-06-22 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chip...@gmail.com Comment #10 on issue 2269 by chip...@gmail.com: Allow inline review for non-text file types http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2269 ymikhel: I have a fix for this coming in 2.0.3, but this bug report is

Re: Issue 3426 in reviewboard: Didn't apply patch cleanly

2014-06-22 Thread reviewboard
Comment #14 on issue 3426 by chip...@gmail.com: Didn't apply patch cleanly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3426 Can you give that example with a sample tree of commits? (Just a diagram showing commits, what's upstream, and what's still local to your tree.) We strongly