Re: RBTools 0.7 is released!

Is it compatible with ReviewBoard = 1.7.28 (not 2.*)? On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 9:39:50 AM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, We just put out a release of RBTools 0.7, the latest major evolution of RBTools. In it you'll find native installers for Windows and Mac, support

Re: RBTools 0.7 is released!

It is. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: Krzysztof Szynter k.szyn...@gmail.com Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com

Re: Issue 3363 in reviewboard: file diffstat box: link to href anchor to file in diff not fully shown in browser (FF) address bar

Comment #4 on issue 3363 by chip...@gmail.com: file diffstat box: link to href anchor to file in diff not fully shown in browser (FF) address bar https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3363 Turns out that the gap was necessary for the case where there's a review banner.

Issue 3757 in reviewboard: cannot submit a review/ship it! for a review requested

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3757 by kepil...@gmail.com: cannot submit a review/ship it! for a review requested https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3757 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its

Issue 3758 in reviewboard: 'Depends on' field does not strike-out discarded reviews, only submitted reviews have strike-out.

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3758 by benjamin...@gmail.com: 'Depends on' field does not strike-out discarded reviews, only submitted reviews have strike-out. https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3758 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! ***

Re: ReviewBoard installation succeeded, but errors when I try to use it

Hi Matthew, When doing an easy_install, Review Board will be installed into an ReviewBoard-x.y.z-pyX.Y.egg in site-packages, which isn't what was showing up in the backtrace. Instead, it's showing up as being in just a reviewboard directory, which is what you'd get when installing via yum.

Re: Issue 3729 in reviewboard: Cannot run rbt post in RBTools 0.7.0

Comment #16 on issue 3729 by brandonj...@gmail.com: Cannot run rbt post in RBTools 0.7.0 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3729 fyi, i had the same issue yesterday and today with the reported version. glad to see these things are aligning -- You received this message

Issue 3759 in reviewboard: Error Authenticating with Active Directory

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3759 by physicss...@gmail.com: Error Authenticating with Active Directory https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3759 What version are you running? I am running ReviewBoard 2.0.12 What's the URL of the

Re: Issue 3753 in reviewboard: CRITICAL: lambda() keywords must be strings in RBTools 0.7.0

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: Component-RBTools Comment #1 on issue 3753 by trowb...@gmail.com: CRITICAL: lambda() keywords must be strings in RBTools 0.7.0 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3753 It's possible that this is fixed in 0.7.1 (please try)

Issue 3760 in reviewboard: Internal Error viewing Server Logs due to character encoding

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3760 by msu...@aurea.com: Internal Error viewing Server Logs due to character encoding https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3760 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its

Re: Incremental Review Problem

Thanks for your reply. We are using CVS version control here. On Thursday, 5 February 2015 04:30:40 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: It would help us to provide some advice if you told us what version control system you're using. If you're using a traditional system like SVN or Perforce,

Re: Incremental Review Problem

Thanks for the reply. We are using CVS version control here. Thanks On Monday, 2 February 2015 16:14:54 UTC+5:30, Nitin Agrawal wrote: Hi, Here is one problem I am facing in handling an incremental review request. Below are the steps: 1) I, as a developer, raised a review request of one

Re: Previous review comments after updating diff

Thanks for your reply.If possible, please include this in the future releases. On Thursday, 5 February 2015 04:28:57 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: Hi, This is currently not supported. We've done a fair amount of investigation into what it would take to display old comments on new

Re: Issue 2054 in reviewboard: RBTools-0.3.2 + Perforce - failed to upload diff when source file is a new file

Comment #7 on issue 2054 by ranjanb...@gmail.com: RBTools-0.3.2 + Perforce - failed to upload diff when source file is a new file https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2054 Thank you #3 roasti...@gmail.com , was scratching my head for so long, you saved my day :) -- You

Re: Issue 3729 in reviewboard: Cannot run rbt post in RBTools 0.7.0

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #17 on issue 3729 by chip...@gmail.com: Cannot run rbt post in RBTools 0.7.0 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3729 @brandon: Can you give 0.7.1 a try and see if it's working for you now? -- You received this message because

Re: Incremental Review Problem

Given that, I'd recommend using git-cvs or a patch stack tool to manage your development on the client side. This will have many benefits beyond easing your reviewboard workflow. -David On Thu Feb 05 2015 at 2:01:20 AM Nitin Agrawal yourni...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your reply. We are

Re: Issue 3580 in reviewboard: IssueOpened checkbox status is not loaded correctly when opening that comment dialog the 1st time after page loading

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 3580 by trowb...@gmail.com: IssueOpened checkbox status is not loaded correctly when opening that comment dialog the 1st time after page loading https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3580 Fixed in release-2.0.x (8a4bc09).