Re: A weird unicode puzzle after upgrade from 2.0.20 to 2.5.4

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Hammond
condemsediffs only needs to be done once. It's optional, but can reduce database size significantly. You don't need to run a periodic condense operation. We also condense individual diffs when manually viewing them as well. I'll try to find out more info about which versions of MySQL are impacted

Re: A weird unicode puzzle after upgrade from 2.0.20 to 2.5.4

2016-12-21 Thread Koushik Roy
MySQL 5.5 Thanks for the explanation So it is not required to condense diff before db migration, right? In fact, condense diff happens on the fly. Is there any advantage to do condense diff from time to time? On Dec 21, 2016 7:19 PM, "Christian Hammond" wrote: > Hey,

Re: Unable to import settings_local.py: No module named settings_local

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Pradeep, You'll need to follow the guide on writing, packaging, and loading extensions. This will have to be written as a packaged, loadable extension, which will be enabled through Review Board. It won't work as a standalone script, since it won't be running within the context of Review

Re: Unable to find a Review Board server for this source code tree

2016-12-21 Thread 许逸斐
I used *rbt setup-repo *command and entered yes to all the questions in the meantime. Did I miss any configuration? 在 2016年12月21日星期三 UTC-8下午3:13:04,Christian Hammond写道: > > Hi, > > Your .reviewboardrc isn't correct. The BRANCH seems to have an error > message in it. It should be a single like

Re: A weird unicode puzzle after upgrade from 2.0.20 to 2.5.4

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Hey, So the good news is, this is not a corruption issue, nor is it related to the contents of any of your files. This error is occurring when saving diff data using our new compressed storage mechanism. We populate a binary field with compressed diff data when uploading a new diff, viewing an

Re: Default reviewer per group

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Moisei, There's no support for per-user default reviewers in Review Board itself (but see below). The rationale is that reviewers tend to pertain to changes (one group might be appropriate for one repository/path, while another might be appropriate to another), rather than a reviewer

Re: Unable to find a Review Board server for this source code tree

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, Your .reviewboardrc isn't correct. The BRANCH seems to have an error message in it. It should be a single like string containing the name of the destination branch. This causes a syntax error in the file, preventing the server from being found. Christian On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 14:45 许逸斐

Re: Unable to find a Review Board server for this source code tree

2016-12-21 Thread 许逸斐
Can someone help me resolve this issue? Here is the content in .reviewboardrc file 在 2016年12月7日星期三 UTC-8下午9:37:38,许逸斐写道: > > REVIEWBOARD_URL = "review board URL" > REPOSITORY = "GitDemo" > BRANCH = "fatal: ambiguous argument 'HEAD': unknown revision or path not > in the working tree. > Use

Re: rbt post of a new file added to Mercurial causes blank files to be added to the diff.

2016-12-21 Thread John
On Monday, December 19, 2016 at 5:10:15 PM UTC-5, John wrote: > > We are using mercurial in our environment and for some reason we are > seeing a number of __init__.py (blank files for module inclusion in python) > are being added to our diff file. Here is the process we used to reproduce >

Default reviewer per group

2016-12-21 Thread Moisei Rabinovich
Hello, Is there some way to specify a default reviewer group for the user (and not by the file path as it is mentioned inthe documentation)? Every time I submit a new issue, I choose my group to be a Reviewer group and I would like it to happen automatically. Thank you! -- Supercharge your

Re: A weird unicode puzzle after upgrade from 2.0.20 to 2.5.4

2016-12-21 Thread Koushik Roy
Christian, As promised, more information in the file attached. Please HELP, HELP!! With the utf8 conversion warning, MY CONCERN IS DATA LOSS/CORRUPTION. If the text contains only plain English, then may be we are fine. But where multi-byte encoding is required, is there any guarantee

Re: Posting review board request from command line

2016-12-21 Thread David Trowbridge
For assigning reviewers, rbt post accepts --target-people and --target-groups arguments, which each accept a comma-separated list of usernames/group names, respectively. You can then add --publish to publish it as well. -David On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:01 AM Vikalp Khandelwal

Posting review board request from command line

2016-12-21 Thread Vikalp Khandelwal
Hi, I am using review board for the first time. I am using perforce as my repository. The steps which I am following are this 1. Create a changelist in perforce 2. Use '*rbt post –d '* 3. Go to the URL generated in browser 4. Add reviewers 5. Publish I wanted to know if there is any way in