Re: Review Board Ticket #4841: When using :smiley_code:, it doesn't render correct emoji. For example, using :ok_hand: renders a broken image, and then the unicode symbol. The symbol is rendered becau

[Om Shankar]

--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4841/
--

New update by OmShiv
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4841


Reply:

Checking to see if the issue is also in the comment section of 
hellosplat.com. 
Input = :ok_hand:
Output = see above

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard-issues/20190820191720.8158.17362%40ip-10-1-54-209.ec2.internal.

Review Board Ticket #4841: When using :smiley_code:, it doesn't render correct emoji. For example, using :ok_hand: renders a broken image, and then the unicode symbol. The symbol is rendered because i

[Om Shankar]

--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4841/
--

New ticket #4841 by OmShiv
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board

Status: New
Tags: Priority:Medium, Type:Defect

File attachments:

 * 1.png
   

 * 2.png
   

 * 6.png
   

 * 4.png
   

 * 3.png
   



--
When using :smiley_code:, it doesn't render correct emoji. For example, using 
:ok_hand: renders a broken image, and then the unicode symbol. The symbol is 
rendered because it is alt-text of the image and image is not loaded from: 
github asset cdn images/icons/emoji/unicode/1f44c.png
==

# What version are you running?
3.0.5

# What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
https://rb.corp.linkedin.com/r/1770323/#review5817509

# What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Start adding a comment/review to any RB. 
2. In the text field, type :ok_hand:, or :ship_it:, or :+1:. Press ok to wait 
for parsing your text formatting.
3. Once the text is formatted and visible, notice that the intended icon is 
shown with a broken image. 

# What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Either the image should be rendered correctly, or the actual unicode emoji 
should be rendered. I see a broken image plus the actual unicode emoji. (This 
is due to being alt-text property of the image, i.e., in HTML, when an 's 
src is not loaded, the alt-text attribute is shown).

# What operating system are you using? What browser?
Mac OS Mojave 10.14.6. Chrome Stable 76. (But this issue is present on all 
browsers I tested including Safari, Opera and FF)

# Please provide any additional information below.
N/A

--

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard-issues/20190820191448.8159.12003%40ip-10-1-54-209.ec2.internal.

Re: RBTools Ticket #4819: "rbt post" is broken (will not accept Perforce changelist number) in 1.0.2 under Python 3.7.3

[Keith Kelly]

--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4819/
--

New update by c0d3h4x0r
For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #4819


Reply:

This issue has been tagged "NeedInfo" for a long time now.  What additional 
information is actually needed?  You should have all the information you need 
to repro this and work on fixing it.  This is blocking Python migration work at 
my company because we can't remove obsolete versions of Python from our 
engineering workstations due to `rbt` still not working correctly with the 
latest version of Python.  Please treat this issue as ultra-high priority, 
especially given the impending Python 2.7.x end-of-life date rapidly 
approaching on 1/1/2020.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard-issues/20190820174941.8159.23388%40ip-10-1-54-209.ec2.internal.

Re: ClearCase and ReviewBoard setup : Any pointer, best practice or setup instruction ?

[Laurent M.]

Thanks you.

Yes I did fix it for the first error.
For the permission I did follow the technote before and also others 
setting. As I was using the apache user (added to the correct group) I have 
to chmod everything, which I did. I finally found that I was missing one 
chmod in one folder. 

It's now working.
Creating review with base CC is working fine, now I'll check with UCM.

Thanks again.



On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 6:32:25 PM UTC+2, Laurent M. wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> I've setup RB with Git with no issue, but when trying with ClearCase, that 
> did not went well. 
> I understand the current integration is done by the community. 
> Looking at old messages (both in forum, review and bugtracking) did not 
> really help.
>
>
> I was wondering if there are any kind of best practice or setup 
> instructions somewhere or made by current CC user ?
>
> I'm on CentOS, CC9.0.1.7, Apache, RB 3.0.15, RBT 1.0.2
>
> The first issue I got was during a rbt post where it keep failing with 
> missing attribute.
>
> if parse_version(server.rb_version) >= parse_version('1.5.3'):
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/api/resource.py", line 
> 348, in __getattr__
> % (self.__class__.__name__, name))
> AttributeError: This RootResource does not have an attribute "rb_version".
>
>
> After some time, I found out that it cannot grab the uuid and by renaming 
> the repository to the CC vobtag, it could process.
>
> Which is where I'm stuck now. I "know" the issue, it's with access 
> permissions. But until now whatever I changed did not help.
>
> When trying to post from rbt
>
>
> >>> Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'err': {u'msg': u'There was an error 
> fetching extended information for this repository.', u'code': 210}}
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/rbt", line 11, in 
> sys.exit(main())
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/commands/main.py", line 
> 120, in main
> command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN, command_name] + args)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/commands/__init__.py", 
> line 725, in run_from_argv
> exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/commands/post.py", line 
> 770, in main
> repository_info = repository_info.find_server_repository_info(api_root
> )
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/clients/clearcase.py", 
> line 1252, in find_server_repository_info
> raise SCMError('You do not have permission to access '
> rbtools.clients.errors.SCMError: You do not have permission to access this 
> repository.
>
>
>
> When doing it from the web
>
>
>   File 
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/clearcase.py", 
> line 58, in __init__
> self.viewtype = self._get_view_type(self.repopath)
>   File 
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/clearcase.py", 
> line 156, in _get_view_type
> shell=_popen_shell)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 711, in __init__
> errread, errwrite)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 1327, in _execute_child
> raise child_exception
> OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/view/rbview/vobs/stdvob'
>
> From what I understand, it cannot access the view/vob to grab/extract the 
> file content.
> The process is running under the apache/apache user
> I have added the apache group to the VOB group list and reprotected (using 
> protect and protectvob (so 'others' also have access)
> Also made apache user as a member of the VOB group
> I tried with a view from one user, also with a view created by the apache 
> user.
>
> So for people that actually run it, do you run it with the generic apache 
> user or a more "CC" ones (like running an httpd instance as vob_owner) ?
> I'm kind of surpized that, even if there are only a few CC user, there is 
> not a lot of info on the "how-to".
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/a775d7d2-1b44-4009-a46c-f30849f180a9%40googlegroups.com.

Re: Review Board 3.0.14 is out

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:00 AM Daniel  wrote:
>
> Hi Christian and Stephen,
>
> I just scanned the forums for possible updates concerning the 
> version-compatilities/ version-availabilites and found this post from March.
>
> Some time ago when i was even more unexperienced in the ways of how the 
> system needs to be to be able to run reviewboard i asked about EPELs and 
> RHELs for revieboard 3.x 
> (https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reviewboard/mSQPKhkKmMw/zFkNNf3gBgAJ)
>
> Since that time we are using RB in the Version 2.5.17 (the Version available 
> via yum like Paul mentioned).
>
> If i understand it correctly, than an EPEL can be configured for the RHEL7 
> and afterwards i can use yum to install something out of that EPEL7 repo 
> (e.g. reviewboard)
>
> Stephen was hoping that RB4 might be able to be delivered that way and 
> Christian was reducing that hope as there are still other hindering factors 
> so that the earliest maybe possible version of reviewboard available via an 
> EPEL again might be RB5. But this still is just a possibility and not certain.
>
> We are working with RHEL7 Machines and i personally do not have much legroom 
> to customize that install ... so i was curious what your last messages in 
> this thread might mean for me and my usecase.
>
> I would be very happy if you would maybe find the time to describe the way 
> (if there is any) in that i might be able to install a "more modern than 
> 2.5.17"-version of RB into a RHEL7 system without manually installing too 
> many dependencies.
>

Short version: I probably can't provide RB 3.0+ on EPEL 7 any time
soon. However, I do expect to be able to deliver 3.0 and later on EPEL
8 within the next six months. We have support for
Modularity/AppStreams in the works there and I will be able to package
the newer versions of Review Board for RHEL/CentOS 8.1+

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/CAFAoxCnwHKS-BAKTWYTjybZDJG%3DQU4qC38asv0hxiGRv-J6BJA%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: Review Board 3.0.14 is out

[Daniel]

Hi Christian and Stephen,

I just scanned the forums for possible updates concerning the 
version-compatilities/ version-availabilites and found this post from March.

Some time ago when i was even more unexperienced in the ways of how the 
system needs to be to be able to run reviewboard i asked about EPELs and 
RHELs for revieboard 3.x 
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reviewboard/mSQPKhkKmMw/zFkNNf3gBgAJ)

Since that time we are using RB in the Version 2.5.17 (the Version 
available via yum like Paul mentioned).

If i understand it correctly, than an EPEL can be configured for the RHEL7 
and afterwards i can use yum to install something out of that EPEL7 repo 
(e.g. reviewboard)

Stephen was hoping that RB4 might be able to be delivered that way and 
Christian was reducing that hope as there are still other hindering factors 
so that the earliest maybe possible version of reviewboard available via an 
EPEL again might be RB5. But this still is just a possibility and not 
certain.

We are working with RHEL7 Machines and i personally do not have much 
legroom to customize that install ... so i was curious what your last 
messages in this thread might mean for me and my usecase. 

I would be very happy if you would maybe find the time to describe the way 
(if there is any) in that i might be able to install a "more modern than 
2.5.17"-version of RB into a RHEL7 system without manually installing too 
many dependencies.

TIA and cheers
Daniel

>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/51e99052-d01c-4658-ae84-a1431e193b9d%40googlegroups.com.

Running reviewbot workers in multiple hosts

[Hema]

We use Redis as message broker for reviewbot and the reviewbot worker 
processes are running in the same web server. We need to increase the 
number of reviewbot workers to handle more requests. But the memory, 
available in the webserver won't be enough to support it.

So, is it possible to run reviewbot workers in multiple hosts and make 
ReviewBoard talk to all of them?

Regards,
Hema.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/73760aa0-b37c-4b1d-9ce0-4b667e588dbb%40googlegroups.com.