It looks like you might be using --diff-filename with a diff you made
yourself?
If that's the case, you need to add --full-index to your git diff command.
-David
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:13 PM Mark Wiederholt
wrote:
I am having problems posting a reviewboard topic. It comes back with the
fo
how often does it fetch from the
upstream?
Second, is your diff based on an upstream revision or are there commits
between the upstream revision and the diff you made?
-David
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:56 PM Mark Wiederholt
wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, December 16, 2016 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-
ec 16, 2016 at 4:28 PM Mark Wiederholt
wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, December 16, 2016 at 6:02:00 PM UTC-6, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> A few other questions:
>
> I'm guessing the repository in the Review Board admin is pointing to a
> local clone (.git directory). Is that c
ged the permission
> on them and just updating the local .git objects with no luck same result.
> I am not sure about the objects in the remote area (which is where the
> reviewboard repository path is pointing to.
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, December 16, 2016 at 6:44:31 PM UTC-6, Dav
remote branch
> (minus one other user commit right now). The remote area is just the git
> repository in a different file location.
>
>
>
> On Friday, December 16, 2016 at 7:02:19 PM UTC-6, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Can you share the command you used to generate the diff file?
&g
:54:30 PM UTC-5, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Dan,
>
> This is something that used to work correctly, but obviously something has
> regressed. I'd actually run into this just a couple days ago, so I'll take
> a look soon.
>
> -David
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:01 A
For assigning reviewers, rbt post accepts --target-people and
--target-groups arguments, which each accept a comma-separated list of
usernames/group names, respectively. You can then add --publish to publish
it as well.
-David
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:01 AM Vikalp Khandelwal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
Sushant,
Review Board currently does not support using third-party OAuth services
for authentication.
-David
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:27 AM Sushant Gupta
wrote:
> Is there is any way/workaround to integrate review board with gmail. So I
> can login to reviewboard with my google credentials.
>
Hi,
You could write a Review Board extension to add your own CSS rules that
take priority, but probably the easiest way would be to use a browser
extension like Stylish.
-David
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:13 AM sathish kumar ravi
wrote:
> I have one small query how can we change the whole css of
You should definitely find something in the apache error log. I'd start by
double-checking the apache logging configuration to make sure logs are
ending up where you'd expect.
-David
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:48 AM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having some trouble migrating my reviewboard from Windows
Can you send the contents of the apache VirtualHost config (which probably
lives in the review board site's conf/ directory)?
-David
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:33 AM wrote:
> The mysqld.log
>
> bash-4.2# cat mysql/data/mysqld.log
> 170113 14:30:40 mysqld_safe Starting mysqld.bin daemon with dat
Something is super weird with your database schema. The "binary" field of
that table should be a longblob, not text (and therefore shouldn't care at
all about encodings one way or another). Can you pull out the schema and
send it here?
-David
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM Shooter Gravatar
wrot
It looks like the SECRET_KEY in the new settings_local.py doesn't match
what you had in the old one. If you copy that over, it should work.
-David
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 7:52 AM wrote:
> Hi,
> We have migrated both Mercurial HgWeb serve and Reviewboard from Windows
> to Linux.
>
>
>1. Repo
Geoff,
On the server, TFS 2013 and newer is supported. Running the Review Board
server on Linux is fine.
One new wrinkle on the client side is that the RBTools interface won't work
with workspaces created by the new VS 2017 release, because Microsoft broke
compatibility with their own SDK (we're
Hi,
We're planning a pretty major redesign of this whole workflow. See
https://www.notion.so/reviewboard/New-Review-Experience-219a188b87a949b6b2703260657fc537
for
our current plans.
-David
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 6:39 AM Gauthier Segay
wrote:
I often want to prepare my top level review summa
Hi,
A couple questions:
- What version control system/hosting service is this repository using?
- Can you go through this process and then look in the Review Board and
apache logs to see if there are any errors?
-David
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:04 PM Rodolfo Gomes Dias <
rodolfo.gomesd...@gmail
A local path to the git repository is a fairly simple case, but we just
haven't implemented post-commit review request support for that yet
(because it's less common than using a hosting service like GitHub). We'd
be happy to take a patch for it.
-David
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 7:38 AM Richard Pet
Hi,
The utf8 error will be fixed in 2.5.8, which will be coming out soon. In
the meantime, you should set DEBUG=False in settings.py (there's no reason
to turn on DEBUG for production installs).
Your second example, which ran when DEBUG was turned off, failed because
there are no groups named "us
John,
You can attach any kind of file to a review request (Update > Add File or
just drag-and-drop). Many file types (such as text and images) can be
reviewed directly and all can be downloaded and have comments attached to
them.
-David
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:38 AM john levin wrote:
> Hello
operations via client side hooks. Now, we are in a
> situation to create review for files that are not under source code (new
> review request only).
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 1:18:03 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> You can attach any ki
nds.
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 11:16:20 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I had some trouble understanding what you were trying to say in
> your last e-mail. Here's the procedure I'd recommend:
>
> - Click on &
Are you running "rbt post" from within a perforce client?
-David
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:35 AM Trent Tuggle wrote:
> Bump... is there any resolution to this problem? I've encountered the
> same problem.
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powe
Shashi,
There's no current integration, but looking at the SonarQube platform, it
would be possible to add something. I don't think we'll have time to do so
in the near future, though.
-David
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:40 AM ShashiKiran Janardan <
shashi.janar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I w
Hi,
1. Account credentials for the Review Board application are separate from
the database (and should be). The Review Board back-end is configured with
some credentials for talking to the DB which can be found in the
settings_local.py file.
2. The Review Board admin UI has some front-end for man
In order to control spam, posts from new members are held for moderation.
It's gone through now.
-David
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 8:29 AM Christian Kolb
wrote:
> Although Google Group says I have recently posted in this group,
> my last (and only so far) topic in this group does not appear.
>
> Wh
Are you referring to running Review Board using an oracle SQL server for
deployment, or are you looking to review PL/SQL code?
-David
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:58 PM Satya B N wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does Review Board support PL/SQL? Does it do syntax highlighting?
>
> I was about to suggest review bo
day, February 22, 2017 at 1:29:37 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>
> Are you referring to running Review Board using an oracle SQL server for
> deployment, or are you looking to review PL/SQL code?
>
>
> the later. Just review PL/SQL code.
>
> Regards,
> S
Eric,
This is a known bug where some of the existing users in the group have
since been marked "inactive". If you remove those users, you should be able
to save it.
We're getting a fix in for 2.5.10.
-David
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:39 AM eric via reviewboard <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wro
s for Oracle PL/SQL.
>
> https://github.com/felipebz/oraclesql-pygments-lexer
>
> Is it possible to use third party Pygments and Review Board will be able
> to highlight KEYWORDS, syntax etc?
>
>
> Regards,
> Satya
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 8:47:53 AM UTC+5:3
Note that these are the credentials configured in the review board admin
interface (the server's connection to the repository), not your local
client where you're running rbt.
-David
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:48 PM Christian Hammond
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like this error isn't coming from us.
Are you looking to apply the default reviewer for all files in the given
repository? If so, the regex ".*" (without the quotes) will match against
all file names.
-David
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 7:52 AM Vikash Singh
wrote:
> I really need help here, Review board does not have good documentation :
egards
> Vikash
>
> On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 9:53:56 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Are you looking to apply the default reviewer for all files in the given
>> repository? If so, the regex ".*" (without the quotes) will match against
>> all file n
01%2BAM.png>
> Regards
> Vikash
>
>
> On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 11:31:16 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Perhaps you could share a screenshot of the default reviewer
>> configuration that's not working? Writing your own script to post changes
>> is g
Kevin,
The correct solution is to write your own evolution. See
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.5/extending/extensions/models/#making-changes-to-custom-models
for
instructions on how to do this and where to put the file.
-David
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:08 PM Kevin Yu wrote:
> Hi All,
Shweta,
Can you share how the repository is configured within the Review Board
admin interface?
-David
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:05 AM Kumari Shweta wrote:
> Hi,
> I have configured reviewboard with Git(cgit and gitweb). with local
> repository, it works fine but with cgit and gitweb it throws
It looks like you have a=tree in the raw file URL, where it should be
a=blob_plain
-David
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:24 PM Kumari Shweta
wrote:
> Hi David,
> REPOSITORY HOSTING
> Hosting service:
>
> REPOSITORY INFORMATION
> Repository type:
> Path:
> http://192.168.122.26/p/common.git
> For lo
Eric,
How is the repository configured in the Review Board admin UI?
-David
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 6:12 PM eric via reviewboard <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Very confused. Perhaps this is fixed by an upgrade? I'm running 2.5.9.
>
> I've got a user who clones a Git repository, makes
:
> Found
>
> This may be a bug in the software, a temporary outage, or an issue
> with the format of your diff.
>
> Shweta
> On Friday, 16 June 2017 11:54:53 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> It looks like you have a=tree in the raw file URL, where it sho
Sure. You can call root.get_review_requests(), which will return a
paginated resource that can then be iterated over. This function will
accept the parameters that the review request list resource uses to filter
things.
-David
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:07 AM eran meiri wrote:
> Hello,
> I was w
is site cannot be reached...
>
> On Sunday, 25 June 2017 07:07:10 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> If you load that URL in a browser what happens? Is it trying to redirect
>> to somewhere? Do you need to use https instead of http?
>>
>> -David
>>
> On
This may be a bug in the software, a temporary outage, or an issue
> with the format of your diff.
>
>
> Please try again, and if you still have trouble,
> contact support.
>
> Shweta
>
>
> On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 02:14:36 UTC+5:30, David Trowbrid
Morten,
It looks like it's probably failing because your payload is being passed in
as files (which is used for uploading diffs or attachments but not for the
vast majority of API fields). If you do data=rbrepo it should work.
-David
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:52 AM Morten Laursen wrote:
> Hi
>
>
It sounds like you just need to specify the correct mysql password in your
command-line.
-David
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 4:03 AM Shilpa R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two machine as follows :-
>
> 1. 172.16.107.138 (Review Board Server and Review Board Database)
> 2. 172.16.107.69 (RBTools)
>
> I want
t;}HTTP/1.1
> 400 BAD REQUEST
>
> Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 05:36:43 GMT
>
> Server: Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu)
>
> Content-Length: 198
>
> Content-Language: en
>
> X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
>
> Expires: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 05:36:43 GMT
>
> Vary: Accept,Cookie,Accept
It looks like you don't have gnu patch installed. rbt land is a relatively
new command and apparently we don't have good error handling for this case
yet.
-David
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:58 AM Chann An wrote:
> I'm getting an error every time I do a 'rbt land -r ' on windows 7
> and windows 2
Probably the easiest way is to look at the release notes:
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/
The 3.0 series is not yet stable (it only has a beta release). 2.5.13.1 is
the latest stable version. That said, if you just install via our normal
installation procedures (pip, bit
How is the repository configured in the Review Board admin UI?
-David
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:39 PM vijay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to post a review from my git server to review board after I
> committed changes to the local repository. But it is throwing an error.
>
> ERROR: Error validati
Aug 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM vijay wrote:
> I am not aware of that. I am just a user of review board. I do not have
> access to review board UI.
>
>
> On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 3:47:24 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> How is the repository configured in the Review B
s being
>> posted vs. what's present in the remote repo?
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM vijay wrote:
>>
>>> I am not aware of that. I am just a user of review board. I do not have
>>> access to review board UI.
>>>
>&g
ote:
> Ya, without any arguments.
> I have .reviewboard file in the local repository. It has
> REVIEWBOARD_URL = "http://reviewboard.company.com";
> REPOSITORY = "repo name"
>
>
> On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 4:16:42 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
At the moment, Review Board with Perforce only supports a pre-commit model
using RBTools to post changes. Whether you call that "extremely limited" is
up to you, but in our experience most Perforce users tend to prefer
pre-commit review because as soon as something is in the depot it typically
affe
The UI is a bit smarter now. First, select the diff that you want to
review. It will detect if a parent diff is necessary, and prompt you for it.
It's almost always faster and easier to use RBTools for this, though. There
you could just run "rbt post b1..b2" and it will do the right thing.
-David
Can you run with --debug and send us the full output?
Also note that you're running a pre-release of 0.7.5. It might be worth
upgrading to 0.7.10 and seeing if your bug is already fixed.
-David
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:05 PM eran meiri wrote:
> Hello, I am having some trouble with using rbt
The easiest way right now would probably be to create an extension that
loads some custom CSS. Using that you could override whatever you liked
within the style.
-David
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 3:56 PM MoonWalker
wrote:
> anything?
>
>
> On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 9:18:11 AM UTC+10, MoonWalke
show_bug.cgi indicates to me that you're experiencing a problem with
Bugzilla, not Review Board. We can't help you with this problem.
-David
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:02 PM Tony F wrote:
> On the line that reads
>
> Status:NEW (edit)
>
> if I click on "edit", nothing seems to happen.
>
> Ho
Read-only access is fine (and in fact, is fine for an active Review Board
server, not just an archived one).
-David
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 6:48 AM Ben wrote:
> Thank you Christian.
> I want to port the ReviewBoard DB to a different site.
>
> This may be an arcane follow-up question;
> Would we
You should not be running with DEBUG=True with Review Board 1.7. Doing so
will definitely break your site.
Run without that, and then check the review board log file to see if there
are any errors. You may need to use rb-site manage /path/to/site
set-siteconfig to enable logging if it was not set
This sounds like the tools didn’t get properly registered. You can run:
rb-site manage /path/to/site registerscmtools
To try this again. It’s possible it failed due to some dependency issue,
but that command should show you the relevant error in that case.
-David
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 9:15 AM
Vince,
We haven't directly tested with MariaDB but based on my understanding I
believe it should work just fine.
-David
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:19 AM Vince Thyng wrote:
> Reviewboard currently recommends MySQL 5.6. MariaDB branches to a 10.x
> numbering with what would have been MariaDB 5.
Can you clarify what you mean by "update apache"?
-David
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:49 AM Not Saying wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 25, 2017 at 6:50:52 AM UTC-7, Not Saying wrote:
>>
>> Is there a procedure to update apache inside of review board? Is so
>> what is it?
>>
>> Thank you
>> D
Yes, the "" part is the blob SHA, not the commit SHA. This has
been the case since git support was initially added.
It is possible to support hosting services that require a commit SHA rather
than a blob SHA, but it means writing a hosting service backend in Review
Board and using RBTools to post
This looks more like the SECRET_KEY isn’t the same as it was with the 2.5
config.
-David
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 7:22 PM Daniel Morgan
wrote:
> I just completed upgrading Review Board 2.5.16 to 3.0 RC1 on a test
> server.
> Logged in without any issues and tried opening an existing review which
Daniel,
I'm not sure we'll have time before the release but we'll definitely be
making sure that everything gets updated asap.
-David
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:20 PM Daniel Morgan
wrote:
> Are there any plans to check the compatibility for the Extensions
> contained in rb-extension-pack with R
Matthew,
That's correct. On the server side, the Review Board application reads from
the repository to get the original versions of the files being changed, and
for some version control systems, to get the data for creating "post
commit" review requests via the web UI. It does not write to the rep
Can you tell us how the repository is configured?
-David
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:18 AM Narayan kumar Ch
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am getting same issue with ReviewBoard version 2.5.13.1.
>
> Log Debug Level:
>
> 2017-11-22 14:49:20,660 - ERROR - - root - Unable to update new review
> request fro
Hi,
The ExtraDataMixin exists but none of the built-in code uses it, and I
think it's broken. We need to rethink it a bit anyway in light of the new
JSON Patch and JSON Merge Patch support that was added in 3.0.
For now, I think this will get you up and running:
const extraData = this.model.get(
Bitbucket Server (nee Stash) isn't yet supported by Review Board. We're
actively working on adding support in Power Pack. If you'd like to help us
test it out, I can get you a beta build.
-David
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:29 AM wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to post review from our hosted Bitbuck
Giuseppe,
The path should be the P4PORT setting. So it should look something like "
perforce.example.com:1666"
-David
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:08 AM Giuseppe Salvatore <
giuseppe.salvat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to add a perforce repository in the list of available
> repositorie
Your exchange server should provide SMTP via "receive connectors":
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996395(v=exchg.160).aspx
-David
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:29 AM Zijian Qi <7zij...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know how would the Review Board work with SMTP (
> https://www.reviewboard.org/
ks with the known
> repository tools, but then when it finds one (p4 info in my case succeeds)
> then it wants probably the current directory to be on a perforce workspace
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks
> Giuseppe
>
>
> On Monday, 8 January 2018 19:16:51 UTC, David Trowbridge wr
refer
> not to since it was me to recommend it.
>
> Thanks for your help and support
>
> Giuseppe
>
> On 11 January 2018 at 00:34, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Giuseppe,
>>
>> There's no way of configuring it via the command-line. The repository has
>
; module = __import__(self.module_name, fromlist=['__name__'], level=0)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbintegrations/extension.py",
>> line 6, in
>> from reviewboard.extensions.hooks import IntegrationHook, URLHook
>> ImportError: cannot impor
ror or
> (error.startswith('[P4.connect()]
> TCP connect to') and 'failed.' in error)):
> *logging.error("RepositoryNotFound was raised: " + error)*
> *traceback.print_stack()*
> -->raise RepositoryNotFound
Is there an HTTP proxy between the Review Board server and the SVN server?
-David
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 1:48 PM Mai Waly wrote:
> Please Please help
>
>
> On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 4:53:31 PM UTC+2, Mai Waly wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> After migrating svn server to a higher OS one wi
ou'll want to request a trial key at
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/trial/
-David
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:43 AM wrote:
> Hi,
> That sounds interesting.
> Are there any version requirements for RBTools or Reviewboard?
>
> On Monday, January 8, 2018 at 9:16:28 PM UTC+
It is possible to run `rbt post` from outside of a source tree, but it
requires manually specifying the server and repository in your command
line. This is what it's trying to detect when it fails looking at the cwd.
You will also need to provide *some* authentication. Whether that's loaded
from ~
Notion recently changed how public URLs work. If you tell me which page has
the broken link I can get it fixed up.
-David
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:22 AM Vlad S. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trying to do development setup, the link just returns -
>
> "You do not have access to Review Board. Please contact
OK, it should be working now. Please let me know if you continue to have
problems.
-David
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:02 AM Vlad S. wrote:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/
>
> вторник, 30 января 2018 г., 19:49:23 UTC+3 пользователь David Trowbridge
It sounds like you probably have a version conflict in the installed
dependencies. Python is a bit annoying in that it will continue to run
things but it won’t load any entry points. Can you check your logs and look
for “VersionConflict”?
-David
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:47 AM Bogdan Gureev
wrote
Due to the way Bitbucket's API works, you'll need RBTools to specify a
parent commit ID. This is done by default when RBTools is the one creating
the diff, but not when you're using --diff-filename (and we haven't had the
need so far to specify it manually because people often aren't creating
their
Hi,
The actual error that's occurring on the server is:
fatal: git cat-file 6bfe0741f111435476e1d6fde42dcaae43a3238a: bad file
This indicates that the server's view of the git repo is either corrupt or
not up to date compared to the upstream git repo that you're developing
against.
-David
On M
Hi,
We actually have a new release of Power Pack coming in just a few days
which includes a big revamp of the reports feature, including an easy way
to just select all users.
-David
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:35 AM Chris Chambers <
cchamb...@cryptontechnology.com> wrote:
> I'm trying out the repo
Can you run rbt post with --debug and send the output?
-David
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:06 PM Jason Stanley
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have setup Review Board version 2.5.16
>
> I have setup a subversion repository.
> Path: https://subversion.xxx.com/repos
>
> When I try to perform a post operation,
It sounds like your browser is uploading the file and reporting its
mimetype incorrectly. Could you (or an admin on your Review Board server)
check out the file attachment under the database section of the admin site
and see what the stored mimetypes are? There may be others we have to
whitelist fo
Just to check--are you expecting review request 630298 to exist? If you're
trying to post SVN commit 630298 your command line should just be "rbt post
630298" (without the -r)
-David
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 6:49 AM Jason Stanley
wrote:
> Hi David
>
> Here you go.
>
> $ rbt post -r 630298 --debu
Hi,
Apparently we're missing a key piece in the usage manual. To start the
worker process, run this command:
reviewbot worker -b
-David
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:40 AM Marcin Ciarka
wrote:
> I'm trying to set up Review Bot with JSHint. After I installed RabbitMQ on
> my local server I have
Review Board does not need to be on the same server as your SVN repository.
Installing on Windows is possible but not recommended for a variety of
issues--if you have an alternative (preferably Linux), that would be better.
RBTools is a suite of command-line tools that people use to take changes
f
Under /admin/settings/authentication/, un-check "Allow anonymous read-only
access"
-David
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:01 PM Alfred von Campe
wrote:
> Is there a way to prevent users from getting access to review requests
> unless they are logged in? It’s been brought to my attention that you can
Can you show us more detail about how you're installing it, and more
context for that error?
reviewbot-worker requires flake8>=3.3.0
-David
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:35 PM MoonWalker
wrote:
> I am in the process to install/configure review bot. I tried to install
> reviewbot-worker, but I got t
c")
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 2573, in
> scan_list
> raise ValueError("Expected "+item_name+" in",line,"at",line[p:])
> ValueError: ('Expected version spec in', 'flake8 ~=2.6.0'
ow. Please take a look at
> the attachment. Beside the previous warning that I post on previous post, I
> did not noticed any other issue.
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 9:42:52 AM UTC+11, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> It looks like you may need to upgrade pip and/or setu
onWalker
wrote:
> David, My mistake I found something on the browser side. I attached the
> logs to this post.
>
> On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 10:46:58 AM UTC+11, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Is there anything in the Review Board log file or the browser's debug
>> c
Can you try upgrading RBTools? You're using 0.7.2, which is three years old.
-David
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:08 AM Sergius Master
wrote:
> Hello Barret,
> It doesn't help in my case. It just hangs.
>
> середа, 17 серпня 2016 р. 23:19:34 UTC+3 користувач Barret Rennie написав:
>>
>> Hi Arpana,
Just to check, can you run pip list and send the output?
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:00 PM MoonWalker
wrote:
> Anything else that I shall try?
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons
e take a look at the file attached.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 2:03:03 PM UTC+11, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Just to check, can you run pip list and send the output?
>>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:00 PM MoonWalker wrote:
>>
> Anyt
Everything looks OK except get rid of step 4--that's creating a DB with the
new schema. Just create an empty database and then use your database dump
to populate it. rb-site upgrade will convert the schema to the new format.
-David
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:07 PM Chris Lang wrote:
> Alright her
ke a look at the logs attached to this post.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 8:34:54 AM UTC+11, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> That's just normal stuff from the API. The real problem is that extension
>> static media (CSS & JS) either isn
As I suggested, disable and enable the extension while keeping an eye on
the log files. And double check the permissions on the directory to verify
that the web server can write to it.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:14 PM MoonWalker
wrote:
> David,
>
> Not sure what else to try 😞
>
> --
> Supercharge
:
> I have done all that already, with same results:-(
>
> On Fri, 16 Mar. 2018, 11:37 am David Trowbridge,
> wrote:
>
>> As I suggested, disable and enable the extension while keeping an eye on
>> the log files. And double check the permissions on the directory to verify
Can you file this as a bug?
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:22 AM 梅铭纸 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When create new review req, it will fetch svn commits, and request this
> url:
>
>
> http://192.168.5.208/api/repositories/5/commits/?start=24961&branch=9C%2589%25E4%25BA%25BA%25E5%258F%25A3%25E6%2599%25BA%25E8%2583
401 - 500 of 1376 matches
Mail list logo
