Re: Binary Files handling in RB 1.0.5
Thanks..This is dummy question but I can not find post-review script any where on my linux distribution. I search all the files and folder and nothing is there. We definately installed RB tools. Kunjal On Dec 2, 12:41 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Kunjal, See:http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/ And the section on nightlies at:http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/develop... Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Chris, I think we have not updated post-review for a while. Where to find it in RB website? Can you point me location? Kunjal On Dec 1, 5:22 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Tom is right, they should be filtered so long as Perforce has them listed as binary files. How recent is your post-review? I'd recommend trying a nightly and seeing if the problem goes away. I seem to recall a corrupt patch issue that was fixed when using binary files, which may trigger this. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: The perforce has marked them as binary file. Why I get error message instead of some standard message saying this is binary file or similar? Do I need to install some patch ? On Dec 1, 5:04 pm, Tom Sakkos nasis...@gmail.com wrote: Assuming that the files are marked as Binary files in Perforce, Review-Board should ignore them and properly say something along the lines of Binary files differ. -Tom On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In our development environment, we have lot of reviews only with Binary files. For example, If I post the review with 4 binary files, what should happen when I click on View Diff? For now, I just try with one binary file, and I get below message when I click on View Diff. Is there any work-around for binary files? The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/ reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: Traceback (most recent call last): File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ views.py, line 153, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 623, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/Djblets-0.5.5-py2.5.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 162, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 622, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting), File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 345, in get_chunks new = get_patched_file(old, filediff) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 261, in get_patched_file return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 129, in patch (filename, tempdir, patch_output)) Exception: The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/ usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Re: Binary Files handling in RB 1.0.5
Chris, I think we have not updated post-review for a while. Where to find it in RB website? Can you point me location? Kunjal On Dec 1, 5:22 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Tom is right, they should be filtered so long as Perforce has them listed as binary files. How recent is your post-review? I'd recommend trying a nightly and seeing if the problem goes away. I seem to recall a corrupt patch issue that was fixed when using binary files, which may trigger this. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: The perforce has marked them as binary file. Why I get error message instead of some standard message saying this is binary file or similar? Do I need to install some patch ? On Dec 1, 5:04 pm, Tom Sakkos nasis...@gmail.com wrote: Assuming that the files are marked as Binary files in Perforce, Review-Board should ignore them and properly say something along the lines of Binary files differ. -Tom On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In our development environment, we have lot of reviews only with Binary files. For example, If I post the review with 4 binary files, what should happen when I click on View Diff? For now, I just try with one binary file, and I get below message when I click on View Diff. Is there any work-around for binary files? The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/ reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: Traceback (most recent call last): File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ views.py, line 153, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 623, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/Djblets-0.5.5-py2.5.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 162, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 622, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting), File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 345, in get_chunks new = get_patched_file(old, filediff) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 261, in get_patched_file return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 129, in patch (filename, tempdir, patch_output)) Exception: The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/ usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from
Re: Binary Files handling in RB 1.0.5
Hi Kunjal, See: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/ And the section on nightlies at: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/development-releases/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Chris, I think we have not updated post-review for a while. Where to find it in RB website? Can you point me location? Kunjal On Dec 1, 5:22 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Tom is right, they should be filtered so long as Perforce has them listed as binary files. How recent is your post-review? I'd recommend trying a nightly and seeing if the problem goes away. I seem to recall a corrupt patch issue that was fixed when using binary files, which may trigger this. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: The perforce has marked them as binary file. Why I get error message instead of some standard message saying this is binary file or similar? Do I need to install some patch ? On Dec 1, 5:04 pm, Tom Sakkos nasis...@gmail.com wrote: Assuming that the files are marked as Binary files in Perforce, Review-Board should ignore them and properly say something along the lines of Binary files differ. -Tom On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In our development environment, we have lot of reviews only with Binary files. For example, If I post the review with 4 binary files, what should happen when I click on View Diff? For now, I just try with one binary file, and I get below message when I click on View Diff. Is there any work-around for binary files? The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/ reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: Traceback (most recent call last): File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ views.py, line 153, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 623, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/Djblets-0.5.5-py2.5.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 162, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 622, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting), File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 345, in get_chunks new = get_patched_file(old, filediff) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 261, in get_patched_file return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 129, in patch (filename, tempdir, patch_output)) Exception: The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/ usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know
Re: Binary Files handling in RB 1.0.5
Assuming that the files are marked as Binary files in Perforce, Review-Board should ignore them and properly say something along the lines of Binary files differ. -Tom On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In our development environment, we have lot of reviews only with Binary files. For example, If I post the review with 4 binary files, what should happen when I click on View Diff? For now, I just try with one binary file, and I get below message when I click on View Diff. Is there any work-around for binary files? The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/ reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: Traceback (most recent call last): File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ views.py, line 153, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 623, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/Djblets-0.5.5-py2.5.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 162, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 622, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting), File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 345, in get_chunks new = get_patched_file(old, filediff) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 261, in get_patched_file return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 129, in patch (filename, tempdir, patch_output)) Exception: The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/ usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Binary Files handling in RB 1.0.5
The perforce has marked them as binary file. Why I get error message instead of some standard message saying this is binary file or similar? Do I need to install some patch ? On Dec 1, 5:04 pm, Tom Sakkos nasis...@gmail.com wrote: Assuming that the files are marked as Binary files in Perforce, Review-Board should ignore them and properly say something along the lines of Binary files differ. -Tom On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In our development environment, we have lot of reviews only with Binary files. For example, If I post the review with 4 binary files, what should happen when I click on View Diff? For now, I just try with one binary file, and I get below message when I click on View Diff. Is there any work-around for binary files? The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/ reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: Traceback (most recent call last): File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ views.py, line 153, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 623, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/Djblets-0.5.5-py2.5.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 162, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 622, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting), File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 345, in get_chunks new = get_patched_file(old, filediff) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 261, in get_patched_file return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 129, in patch (filename, tempdir, patch_output)) Exception: The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/ usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Binary Files handling in RB 1.0.5
Tom is right, they should be filtered so long as Perforce has them listed as binary files. How recent is your post-review? I'd recommend trying a nightly and seeing if the problem goes away. I seem to recall a corrupt patch issue that was fixed when using binary files, which may trigger this. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: The perforce has marked them as binary file. Why I get error message instead of some standard message saying this is binary file or similar? Do I need to install some patch ? On Dec 1, 5:04 pm, Tom Sakkos nasis...@gmail.com wrote: Assuming that the files are marked as Binary files in Perforce, Review-Board should ignore them and properly say something along the lines of Binary files differ. -Tom On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In our development environment, we have lot of reviews only with Binary files. For example, If I post the review with 4 binary files, what should happen when I click on View Diff? For now, I just try with one binary file, and I get below message when I click on View Diff. Is there any work-around for binary files? The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/ reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: Traceback (most recent call last): File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ views.py, line 153, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 623, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/Djblets-0.5.5-py2.5.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 162, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 622, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting), File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 345, in get_chunks new = get_patched_file(old, filediff) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 261, in get_patched_file return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file) File /projects/mob_tools/xampp/1.6.4-brcm-v2/lib/python2.5/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/ diffutils.py, line 129, in patch (filename, tempdir, patch_output)) Exception: The patch to 'c:/Perforce/Sources/Common/stack/hedge/sdt/ usim.sbk' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.6SzZlW/tmpSst3n_ patch: malformed patch at line 21: -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
