Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

I just tried to point to the root of the repo, it doesn't solve the issue : refault reviewer is applied when i upload a .diff file, but it doesn't when i use the UI to browse commits. Le mercredi 18 janvier 2017 10:18:39 UTC+1, Shooter Gravatar a écrit : > > I'll see what i can do with the repo

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

I'll see what i can do with the repo path. For the diff, see the attached file. Le mercredi 18 janvier 2017 01:02:06 UTC+1, Christian Hammond a écrit : > > If it's a new install and database, definitely point it to the root of the > repo. This will prevent other kinds of problems. > > For the

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

The repo contains a lot of branches and "stuff" that we don't want to survey (and we don't want to make things to complicated for our users ho well...), so the repo path points directly to the "trunk" of our development. Too much history and not enough forward thinking at the time...

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

The repository path should be pointing to the root of the repository (probably /svn), rather than a subdirectory (/svn/trunk), but if you already have a bunch of review requests in there, you probably have to keep it as-is. Can you show me an example filename listed in the diff viewer that should

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

Good news ! As for the default reviewer, the expression is the following : > Base/Tools/Nora2/.* > The repo is : > https://x.x.x.x/svn/trunk > The commited files are located in : > myDrive:\_BaseSVN\Trunk\Base\Tools\Nora2 (on Windows...) > Le samedi 14 janvier 2017 23:56:15 UTC+1,

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

I believe I have a fix we can put in for the upcoming Review Board 2.5.8 release for the warning. Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Christian Hammond

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

I've seen this. This is a behavioral quirk in MySQL. Basically, this is likely a longblob, but some versions of MySQL assume the incoming content should be Unicode text and does validation on that. The validation fails, and you get the warning you have above:

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

Something is super weird with your database schema. The "binary" field of that table should be a longblob, not text (and therefore shouldn't care at all about encodings one way or another). Can you pull out the schema and send it here? -David On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM Shooter Gravatar

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

Another update. I completely remove ReviewBoard 2.5.7 from my system and downloaded again 2.5.6.1 with easy_install. Run the installation again. Same configuration as before. I can now create a review request from the UI by browsing the commits on my repo, and the default reviewer rule is

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

More info on this. I started from scratch once again : deleted MySQL database, remove all reviewboard sites and start the rb-site install process again. My site now has one repository, 2 users (the admin and me), one group (myGroup) and one default reviewer (assigns a specific path to

Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

Hi. Fresh installation of RB 2.5.7 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS with Mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.7.16. Repository is SVN. The instance of Review Board has 6 users, 5 groups and one default reviewer rule to assign a group for a specific set of files. Default reviewer rule is: Base/Tools/Nora2/.* > When