Re: Which Mercurial version to target?

Thanks Gilles! I'll have to review the patch again no matter what, but I think this may be a problem with the hgsubversion integration since the core hg commands are working as expected (shelling out to hg, that is.) If this is the case -- that hgsubversion is to blame -- should I just target the

Re: Which Mercurial version to target?

Dan, I don't know much about hgsubversion. I usually use only hg and mercurial-reviewboard extension to upload patches. You can contact Augie Fackler (CC'd), aka durin42 on #mercurial, to get some more information about hgsubversion, as I think he's still maintaining it. He dropped you a comme

Re: Which Mercurial version to target?

On Friday 14 May 2010 03:15:35 pm Dan Buch wrote: > Howdy all, > > I'm working on this patch: > > http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1464/ > > > chipx86 recommended I post to the group about which version of Mercurial > I should target. Thoughts? > > > Cheers, If you use only the Command Line I

Which Mercurial version to target?

Howdy all, I'm working on this patch: http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1464/ chipx86 recommended I post to the group about which version of Mercurial I should target. Thoughts? Cheers, -- ~Dan pgpjsInCwnJdI.pgp Description: PGP signature