Re: Issue 477 in reviewboard: Per reviewer email control

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Comment #17 on issue 477 by james.a.baker: Per reviewer email control http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=477 Ok I cede the control issue, and have no problem with other people getting as much mail as they want. No good threading here (cough corporate Outlook cough), so it

Re: Issue 477 in reviewboard: Per reviewer email control

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Comment #16 on issue 477 by chipx86: Per reviewer email control http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=477 Another thought: Every bug tracker I've used has sent me an e-mail when I file a bug. That's not much different from what Review Board does. Do people have the same compl

Re: Issue 477 in reviewboard: Per reviewer email control

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Comment #15 on issue 477 by chipx86: Per reviewer email control http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=477 This probably depends on whether or not you're using mailing lists. In the case of a mailing list, you want an e-mail going to the list, and in most cases that implies go

Re: Issue 477 in reviewboard: Per reviewer email control

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Comment #14 on issue 477 by james.a.baker: Per reviewer email control http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=477 I don't even think there needs to be an *option* for "send me email on my own Publish events" -- it's just spam, plain and simple. Perhaps we could separate this s

Re: Issue 1838 in reviewboard: HTTP mail is broken

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: SetupIssue Comment #3 on issue 1838 by trowbrds: HTTP mail is broken http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1838 Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group. To post to this group, send

Re: Issue 1838 in reviewboard: HTTP mail is broken

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 1838 by bmgcolorado: HTTP mail is broken http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1838 I restarted Apache and things cleaned up. Looks like a false alarm! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group.

Re: Issue 1838 in reviewboard: HTTP mail is broken

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 1838 by chipx86: HTTP mail is broken http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1838 This looks like a stale caching issue. Clear your server cache and it should go away. Please let me know if it doesn't. -- You received this m

Issue 1839 in reviewboard: File mode changes do not appear in the diff viewer

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1839 by sum...@yelp.com: File mode changes do not appear in the diff viewer http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1839 There is nothing in the diff viewer to indicate file mode changes. Perhaps the **Files

Issue 1838 in reviewboard: HTTP mail is broken

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1838 by bmgcolorado: HTTP mail is broken http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1838 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? 1.5 What's the URL of the pag

Re: Issue 1837 in reviewboard: requires.txt in the ReviewBoard .egg-info specifies djblets 0.5.7

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 1837 by chipx86: requires.txt in the ReviewBoard .egg-info specifies djblets 0.5.7 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1837 That file is built when running setup.py install, develop, egg_info, or other commands. I imagine your RPM spec file isn't runn

Issue 1837 in reviewboard: requires.txt in the ReviewBoard .egg-info specifies djblets 0.5.7

2010-10-01 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1837 by Karrde712: requires.txt in the ReviewBoard .egg-info specifies djblets 0.5.7 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1837 What version are you running? ReviewBoard 1.5 ReviewBoard 1.5 shold require Dj