Re: Issue 1795 in reviewboard: using --submit-as with post-review causes generated mails to be from original submitter

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 1795 by michakel...@gmail.com: using --submit-as with post-review causes generated mails to be from original submitter http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1795 Is this a post-review issue? We run RB 1.5 beta 2, and see the same behavior. But the

Re: Issue 2269 in reviewboard: reviewers can review uploaded file just like diff file

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2269 by wangxiao...@gmail.com: reviewers can review uploaded file just like diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2269 all files(.txt .java .c .h .php .js .css .xml .py .sh .pl etc) expect Binary files and pictures -- You received this

Issue 2272 in reviewboard: Automatic Update of Chagne Number in ReveiwBoard

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2272 by jagtar.c...@gmail.com: Automatic Update of Chagne Number in ReveiwBoard http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2272 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you

Re: Issue 2272 in reviewboard: Automatic Update of Chagne Number in ReveiwBoard

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 2272 by chip...@gmail.com: Automatic Update of Chagne Number in ReveiwBoard http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2272 The change number can only be updated today through the API, as giving users the option to specify their own change number can actually

Re: Issue 1795 in reviewboard: using --submit-as with post-review causes generated mails to be from original submitter

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Component-EMail Comment #4 on issue 1795 by chip...@gmail.com: using --submit-as with post-review causes generated mails to be from original submitter http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1795 It's part RBTools, part

Issue 2273 in reviewboard: number of incomming/outgoing reviews reset after migration to 1.6

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2273 by kofem...@googlemail.com: number of incomming/outgoing reviews reset after migration to 1.6 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2273 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.

Re: Issue 2273 in reviewboard: number of incomming/outgoing reviews reset after migration to 1.6

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Critical Milestone-Release1.6.x Component-Dashboard Comment #1 on issue 2273 by chip...@gmail.com: number of incomming/outgoing reviews reset after migration to 1.6

Re: Issue 2273 in reviewboard: number of incomming/outgoing reviews reset after migration to 1.6

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2273 by kofem...@googlemail.com: number of incomming/outgoing reviews reset after migration to 1.6 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2273 I run Mysql 5.0.51a on debian lenny. fixreviewcounts did the job. Thanks. Attachments: Screenshot-My

Re: Issue 2273 in reviewboard: number of incomming/outgoing reviews reset after migration to 1.6

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2273 by chip...@gmail.com: number of incomming/outgoing reviews reset after migration to 1.6 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2273 We thought we had this nailed down in the betas, but alas... We call fixreviewcounts on upgrade, which should have

Re: Issue 2273 in reviewboard: number of incomming/outgoing reviews reset after migration to 1.6

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 2273 by kofem...@googlemail.com: number of incomming/outgoing reviews reset after migration to 1.6 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2273 It looks like the group counts were correct though? Given the difference in screenshots. So the broken fields

Re: Issue 2268 in reviewboard: My incoming reviews have a negative number

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 2268 by manjunat...@gmail.com: My incoming reviews have a negative number http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2268 When I upgraded from 1.5 to 1.6, i got -1 for Outgoing Reviews and zero for all the other case (example Outgoing Reviews). When I ran

Re: Issue 2268 in reviewboard: My incoming reviews have a negative number

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #7 on issue 2268 by manjunat...@gmail.com: My incoming reviews have a negative number http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2268 When I upgraded from 1.5 to 1.6, i got -1 for Outgoing Reviews and zero for all the other case (example All My Requests). When I ran

Re: Issue 1722 in reviewboard: UTF-16 file from Perforce not displayed

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 1722 by joshua.m...@gmail.com: UTF-16 file from Perforce not displayed http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1722 It just shows This is a binary file, contents cannot be displayed or whatever it usually does when encountering a binary file. -- You

Re: Issue 2268 in reviewboard: My incoming reviews have a negative number

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #8 on issue 2268 by trowb...@gmail.com: My incoming reviews have a negative number http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2268 Issue 2273 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues

Re: Issue 2274 in reviewboard: add Outgouing link to the dashboard

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #1 on issue 2274 by chip...@gmail.com: add Outgouing link to the dashboard http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2274 Thanks, but this isn't how we'd like to tackle this. Rather, the idea is to have a drop-down arrow besides My

Issue 2275 in reviewboard: Defect in the Bugs field

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2275 by gdinsh...@gmail.com: Defect in the Bugs field http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2275 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please

Re: Issue 2275 in reviewboard: Defect in the Bugs field

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: UserError Comment #1 on issue 2275 by trowb...@gmail.com: Defect in the Bugs field http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2275 This is as expected. The bugs field is not supposed to be a text description, but rather a list of bug IDs to link. -- You

Re: Issue 2184 in reviewboard: Mercurial rename support: Pure file renames with *no actual changes* to the file fails with Diff did not apply cleanly

2011-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2184 by carl.van...@gmail.com: Mercurial rename support: Pure file renames with *no actual changes* to the file fails with Diff did not apply cleanly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2184 This bug applies to more than just Mercurial changesets.