Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #12 on issue 3171 by chip...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
Fixed for 0.5.6 on release-0.5.x (4c39641)
--
You received this message because this project is configur
Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Owner: chip...@gmail.com
Labels: Milestone-RBTools-Release0.5 Component-RBTools
Comment #11 on issue 3171 by chip...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
F
Comment #10 on issue 3171 by eyuw...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
I'm currently also one of the two guys working on the Git infrastructure. I
don't think we drop this file in any of the bare repos on
Comment #9 on issue 3171 by chip...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
How are you linking up repositories today? The .reviewboardrc method is
what every company we know is using. When I was working there,
Comment #8 on issue 3171 by eyuw...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
Thanks for this confirmation! For now, I'd just use OrderedDict() and
stripping off the unused SCM types in our installation.
I hope
Comment #7 on issue 3171 by chip...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
Yep, it'll take both into account. Any user configuration will also
override the repository configuration.
--
You received this messa
Comment #6 on issue 3171 by eyuw...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
Sounds good to me. I haven't read the code to find this out, but I want to
confirm this following case with you:
If user has a .revie
Comment #5 on issue 3171 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
Yes, we recommend putting a .reviewboardrc in the root of each repository.
There are definitely improvements we can make to the SCM det
Comment #4 on issue 3171 by eyuw...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
OK, let me confirm if I understand your suggestion. You meant when we
provision a git repo, we should drop in a .reviewboardrc file in
Comment #3 on issue 3171 by chip...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
I'm talking about the repositories, not for individual users. A Git
repository using Review Board needs a .reviewboardrc file to link i
Comment #2 on issue 3171 by eyuw...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
What you suggest might work for a small group, but doesn't really scale for
a company with 13K+ employees.
You are suggesting to ask
Comment #1 on issue 3171 by chip...@gmail.com: RBTools: A critical bug for
determining SCM type?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3171
We can use an OrderedDict, but it's not a guaranteed fix, as we can't
expect a certain order from Python Entrypoints.
The recommendat
12 matches
Mail list logo
