How looks review/SCM environment in Your project

2010-06-15 Thread Jan Koprowski
Hi! I'm looking opportunity to talk about SCM/review processes in companies. I have some executed the point of view and I confront it with pleasure. I'm curious which tool You use, how looks Your reviewboard integration, which tools are good, which bad and why. What You recommend and what

Re: ReviewBoard with GIT

2010-06-15 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, First thing to check is that git is in your path, accessible by your web server. What are you using for your Path and Mirror Path? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at

Re: ReviewBoard with GIT

2010-06-15 Thread Christian Hammond
Git only works with local file paths on the Review Board server, unless you have the Raw URL field set. For that, you need a web-based Git viewer such as cgit or gitweb. See the Raw File URL Mask section at http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/management/repositories/ Basically, Git

Re: ReviewBoard with GIT

2010-06-15 Thread Jan Koprowski
This looks like Christain said - git can't find repo. Read this: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/management/repositories/#git to know how get patches for Git to enter. On Jun 16, 1:06 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Git only works with local file paths on the

Re: Issue 1072 in reviewboard: HTTPS Subversion repositories don't work with Review Board

2010-06-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #48 on issue 1072 by o3j5h9s3: HTTPS Subversion repositories don't work with Review Board http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1072 old thread but maybe the workaround I found may help some. thou apache is running as apache user the home I got by adding log to the

Re: Issue 1587 in reviewboard: Some lines don't word-wrap correctly on IE/Chrome

2010-06-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 1587 by seagle0128: Some lines don't word-wrap correctly on IE/Chrome http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1587 Some lines like this: Name=VCCLCompilerTool

Issue 1686 in reviewboard: New feature request: code commentary

2010-06-15 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1686 by AaronJSherman: New feature request: code commentary http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1686 *NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ What version are

Re: Issue 831 in reviewboard: Can't leave comments before you publish your own newly created review request

2010-06-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #13 on issue 831 by trowbrds: Can't leave comments before you publish your own newly created review request http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=831 Issue 1686 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 1686 in reviewboard: New feature request: code commentary

2010-06-15 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 831 Comment #1 on issue 1686 by trowbrds: New feature request: code commentary http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1686 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 831 in reviewboard: Can't leave comments before you publish your own newly created review request

2010-06-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #14 on issue 831 by AaronJSherman: Can't leave comments before you publish your own newly created review request http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=831 Since my issue 1686 was marked as a dup of this, let me cover what I think are the extras from that request

Re: Issue 1072 in reviewboard: HTTPS Subversion repositories don't work with Review Board

2010-06-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #49 on issue 1072 by chipx86: HTTPS Subversion repositories don't work with Review Board http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1072 In new installs, HOME will point to a writable directory, which should solve this problem. In new upgrades, rb-site will tell the user