Re: ReviewBoard with GIT

It's a clone of the repository on the Review Board server itself. Path points to that clone, and Mirror Path would be the remote origin that the other developers are using for the central repository. Think of Path as being what Review Board actually uses for fetching files, and Mirror Path as just

Re: ReviewBoard with GIT

Now I get the point.. But If keep clone on the server, I need to keep the clone in-sync with every commit happening in developers workspace. Is that correct? We already have CGIT configured. How I can re-sue CGIT here? Should I say PATH as

Re: ReviewBoard with GIT

Here is some informations about cgit configuration: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/management/repositories/#cgit On Jun 17, 12:58 am, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Now I get the point.. But If keep clone on the server, I need to keep the clone in-sync with every

Re: Issue 1587 in reviewboard: Some lines don't word-wrap correctly on IE/Chrome

Comment #8 on issue 1587 by seagle0128: Some lines don't word-wrap correctly on IE/Chrome http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1587 Okay! I see. But I don't understand why it's good on Firefox. Now I have to recommend others to use Firefox to visit the reviewboard. Thanks

Re: Issue 1637 in reviewboard: Review Board + perforce can not upload diff

Comment #4 on issue 1637 by bweav19: Review Board + perforce can not upload diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1637 I have the same issue, here is what my debug output looks like [r...@re ~]# post-review 513239 --debug svn info p4 info repository info: Path:

Re: Issue 1637 in reviewboard: Review Board + perforce can not upload diff

Comment #5 on issue 1637 by bweav19: Review Board + perforce can not upload diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1637 I have the exact same issue, here is my output with debug but not output-diff. As a note this is a brand new reviewboard server and my first time

Re: Issue 1587 in reviewboard: Some lines don't word-wrap correctly on IE/Chrome

Comment #9 on issue 1587 by chipx86: Some lines don't word-wrap correctly on IE/Chrome http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1587 It's a difference in how Firefox and other browsers choose to handle long normally unwrappable lines. Firefox is forcing a wrap, whereas the

Issue 1687 in reviewboard: post-review API Error 105

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1687 by Anthony.L.Chen: post-review API Error 105 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1687 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? RBTools 0.2, Rb

Issue 1688 in reviewboard: Raw File URL mask field does not take more than 128 characters (running git supported RB instance) ?

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1688 by jtsharma: Raw File URL mask field does not take more than 128 characters (running git supported RB instance) ? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1688 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information

Re: Issue 1688 in reviewboard: Raw File URL mask field does not take more than 128 characters (running git supported RB instance) ?

Comment #1 on issue 1688 by jtsharma: Raw File URL mask field does not take more than 128 characters (running git supported RB instance) ? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1688 Would appreciate a quick workaround on this issue as one of our team is blocked because of

Re: Issue 1688 in reviewboard: Raw File URL mask field does not take more than 128 characters (running git supported RB instance) ?

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 1688 by chipx86: Raw File URL mask field does not take more than 128 characters (running git supported RB instance) ? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1688 This isn't a problem in the released beta 2. -- You received

Re: Issue 1688 in reviewboard: Raw File URL mask field does not take more than 128 characters (running git supported RB instance) ?

Comment #3 on issue 1688 by jtsharma: Raw File URL mask field does not take more than 128 characters (running git supported RB instance) ? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1688 Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 1449 in reviewboard: Incompatible with Pylucene 3.0.0

Comment #5 on issue 1449 by latchkey: Incompatible with Pylucene 3.0.0 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1449 I'm seeing this too. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to

Issue 1689 in reviewboard: post-review --guess-summary should trim internal newlines

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1689 by tstoakes: post-review --guess-summary should trim internal newlines http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1689 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you