You're welcome. I hope that helps.
In the interest of accuracy, I need to modify my post earlier
regarding the problems with platform.py.
After more thorough testing, I do not believe that these exceptions
are directly caused by any of the functions defined in platform.py.
Rather, I think they a
Hello. I'm looking into code review tools. One of the features I'm
looking for is a review status feature where a review can be set to a
"approved" or "denied" state. Does Review Board have such a feature?
If not, is it on the list of features to add?
Thanks
--
Want to help the Review Board p
Do you want this for tracking purposes? At the moment, individual reviewers
can mark their approval with the "ship it" flag, though there's no policy
built around this (it won't prevent a checkin if you don't have one or more
ship-its, for example). Other than that, we generally rely on people
comm
It would also be nice to be able to set the status by file and once
all files in the review have been approved, the commit is approved.
On Nov 1, 11:43 am, dmocek wrote:
> Hello. I'm looking into code review tools. One of the features I'm
> looking for is a review status feature where a review
I'm looking for the tool to manage the process more. For example (and
I haven't looked at Review Board in depth yet to see which features it
already supports), I'd like to be able to login and see all my pending
reviews (the one's I've submitted) and see what their status is (e.g.
Review1 is 90% c
We have numerous subversion servers in our organization, specifically
so that we can have different access controls for each repo.
I'm trying to figure out if the way I'm thinking of deploying
ReviewBoard even makes sense, and if it does, I've got some questions.
Specifically, we want to mak
Hi Eric,
In the current release, yes, you'll need to have a different installation
per repository if you want this level of restriction. Patching LDAP/AD is an
option, though an annoying one certainly. You could also require that users
create a new account manually on that server if that would wor
1. interesting. I tried "parent" but it didn't seem to work the way I
expected. It should compare the current revision with the parent revision,
but didn't seem to do that. I suspect I probably did not set up the test
correctly. In any case, I'll give it another try.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:01
