Re: Upgrading from 1.0.6 to 2.0.x - suggestions and recommendations?

2015-02-27 Thread Srinidhi B S
Hi, On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Srinidhi B S wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I'm (finally!) preparing to upgrade our very old ReviewBoard instance > from 1.0.6 to 2.0.12. I've been worried / concerned about the upgrade > path. > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: >

Re: "View Diff" cause "patch didn't apply cleanly" error when ReviewBoard is used with BitBucket repositories

2015-02-27 Thread anand kadu
Hi Olivia, I am able to set up git with review board and able to view diff. For this you need to have local git repository on same machine as review board or else if you want connect to remote repository u need to have gitweb installed in git server. Thanks Anand On Friday, January 6, 2012 at

Re: RBTools 0.7 is released!

2015-02-27 Thread David Carson
Am I the only one who finds a need for more documentation/examples on this? Is there any way, for example, to exclude all files of a certain pattern *regardless* of the path where such files are found? On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 3:19:40 PM UTC-5, David Carson wrote: > > The 'rbt' help for

Re: Posting to reviewboard fails: Got API Error 207 (HTTP code 400): The file was not found in the repository.

2015-02-27 Thread David Trowbridge
Hi, Can you share what the repository configuration looks like in the Review Board admin? -David On Thu Feb 26 2015 at 7:43:00 PM Jonathan Anderson < jonat...@webessenceonline.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am using bitbucket as my repo and it's configured in reviewboard as a > repo. Tried to googl

Re: RBTools 0.7 is released!

2015-02-27 Thread Barret Rennie
Hi David, Sorry for the lack of clarity in the documentation. It will be rectified in the next minor release of RBTools. The pattern support for the -X flag varies by the SCM tool. Hg provides its own file exclusion support, so when RBTools is working with a Mercurial repository, it will use M